Santos v. Sofa Doctor Inc.
Plaintiff: Jose Santos
Defendant: Sofa Doctor Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv09349
Filed: November 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: James L Cott
Referring Judge: Paul A Engelmayer
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 207 fl
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 11/9/2020) (nb)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Sofa Doctor Inc...(dnh)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (dnh)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (dnh)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(dnh)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney David Abrams. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: The Sofa Doctor Inc.. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: Exclude from the entry of business name any leading A, An or The.. (dnh)
November 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The Sofa Doctor Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Jose Santos..(Abrams, David)
November 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Abrams, David)
November 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Sofa Doctor Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-22485201)Document filed by Jose Santos..(Abrams, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Santos v. Sofa Doctor Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sofa Doctor Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Santos
Represented By: David Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?