Arias v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
| Daly Arias |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv09723 |
| November 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| P Kevin Castel |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 pi |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent The Vanguard Group for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. Document filed by Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc...(Nastro, Justin) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Notice to Attorney Justin Thomas Nastro to RE-FILE Document #3 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. ERROR(S): Corporate Parents/Other affiliates were not added. Please re-file this document and when prompted: Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?, select the YES radio button and enter the Corporate Parent(s) or Affiliate(s). (ldi) |
Filing 6
ORDER INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: COUNSEL (OR PLAINTIFF FOR THE REMOVING DEFENDANT) SHALL IMMEDIATELY SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO ALL PARTIES. Counsel for all parties shall appear for an Initial Pretrial Conference, held pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, January 20, 2021 at 2:30 p.m. Principal trial counsel shall appear at this and all subsequent conferences. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, conferences with the Court in civil cases will be held by teleconferencing until further notice. For initial pretrial conferences, plaintiff(s) counsel shall, no later than 5 business days before the conference, email a copy of the agreed upon (or disputed) Civil Case Management Plan & Scheduling Order to: castelnysdchambers@nysd.uscourts.gov. The call-in information for all teleconferences is: Dial-in: (888) 363-4749, Access Code: 3667981. SO ORDERED.( Initial Conference set for 1/20/2021 at 02:30 PM before Judge P. Kevin Castel.) (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 11/19/20) (yv)
|
| ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 5 INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (yv) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by William Howard Yost on behalf of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc...(Yost, William) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Justin Thomas Nastro. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: All Parties. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly. (sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Justin Thomas Nastro. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $750,000,000; Fee Status code due (due). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to $750,000; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid). (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge P. Kevin Castel. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
| Filing 3 FILING ERROR - CORPORATE PARENT/OTHER AFFILIATE NOT ADDED - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc...(Nastro, Justin) Modified on 11/23/2020 (ldi). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Nastro, Justin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of Bronx. Case Number: 28098/2020E. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-22646586).Document filed by Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Summons, Complaint, Affidavit of Service, #2 Exhibit B. Answer, #3 Exhibit C. Discovery Response).(Nastro, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Arias v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daly Arias | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Justin Thomas Nastro |
| Represented By: | William Howard Yost |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
