Eden Brands, Inc. v. Hatch Collection LLC
| Eden Brands, Inc. |
| Hatch Collection LLC |
| 1:2020cv09827 |
| November 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| John P Cronan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 dj |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Eden Brands, Inc. waiver sent on 12/2/2020, answer due 2/1/2021. Document filed by Eden Brands, Inc...(Gerber, Andrew) |
Filing 3
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: This case has been assigned to the undersigned for all purposes. All counsel must familiarize themselves with the Court's Individual Rules, which are available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-john-p-cronan. Counsel for all parties are hereby ORDERED to appear before the undersigned for an Initial Pretrial Conference ("IPTC") in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on February 8, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. Unless the Court directs otherwise, the Court plans to conduct the conference by teleconference. At the scheduled time, counsel for all parties should call (866) 434-5269, access code 9176261, and as further set forth in this Order. So ordered. (Initial Conference set for 2/8/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge John P. Cronan). (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 11/23/2020) (rjm)
|
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John P. Cronan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Gerber, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hatch Collection LLC. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-22692111)Document filed by Eden Brands, Inc...(Gerber, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Eden Brands, Inc. v. Hatch Collection LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eden Brands, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Isaac Gerber |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hatch Collection LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
