Joyner v. Alston & Bird LLP et al
| Dawn M. Joyner |
| Lynn Nabors, Alston & Bird LLP, Richard Hays, Cathy Benton and Michael Stephens |
| 1:2020cv10093 |
| December 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Gabriel W Gorenstein |
| Analisa Torres |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Motion to Dismiss, Memorandum of Law, Declaration of James H. Sullivan, Jr. and Unpublished Authorities Cited in the Memorandum of Law served on Plaintiff on January 27, 2021. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Alston & Bird LLP..(Jones, Jenna) |
| Filing 22 DECLARATION of James H. Sullivan, Jr. in Support re: #20 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint.. Document filed by Alston & Bird LLP..(Cambria, John) |
| Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #20 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. . Document filed by Alston & Bird LLP..(Cambria, John) |
| Filing 20 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. Document filed by Alston & Bird LLP..(Cambria, John) |
| Filing 19 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion for Mandatory Judicial Notice served on Plaintitff on January 22, 2021. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Alston & Bird LLP..(Jones, Jenna) |
| Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #15 MOTION FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE. . Document filed by Alston & Bird LLP..(Cambria, John) |
Filing 17
ORDER: Any answer to the amended complaint shall be filed by January 29, 2021. If defendant wishes to file a motion to dismiss in lieu of answer, the pre-motion conference requirement is waived and the motion shall be filed on or before January 29, 2021. Plaintiff shall file any response to the motion by February 19, 2021. Defendant shall file any reply by March 5, 2021. Plaintiff may file any response by email by sending it in pdf form to Temporary_Pro_Se_Filing@nysd.uscourts.gov In the alternative, the response may be mailed to Pro Se Docketing, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. The Clerk is requested to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff. (As further set forth in this Order.) Alston & Bird LLP answer due 1/29/2021.( Motions due by 1/29/2021., Responses due by 3/5/2021) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 1/11/2021) (cf) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #17 Order, Set Deadlines, to Dawn M. Joyner, c/o 343 Gold Street, #903, Brooklyn, NY 11201. (dsh) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER: Plaintiff shall file any opposition to the motion to dismiss with a filing made on or before January 22, 2021. Any reply by defendants may be filed by February 5, 2021. Plaintiff may file the opposition by email by sending it in pdf form to Temporary_Pro_Se_Filing@nysd.uscourts.gov In the alternative, the response may be mailed to Pro Se Docketing, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. The Clerk is requested to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 1/22/2021. Replies due by 2/5/2021). (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 1/8/2021) (rjm) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #13 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge to Dawn M. Joyner at c/o 343 Gold Street, #903, Brooklyn, NY 11201. (kh) |
| Mailed a copy of #16 Scheduling Order to Dawn M. Joyner at c/o 343 Gold Street, #903, Brooklyn, NY 11201. (kh) |
| Filing 15 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE. Document filed by Dawn M. Joyner.(sc) |
| Filing 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, re: amending #1 Complaint against Alston & Bird LLP with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Dawn M. Joyner. Related document: #1 Complaint.(sc) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement) and Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring a Report and Recommendation) Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 9. Referred to Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein. Motions referred to Gabriel W. Gorenstein. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff pro se. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 1/7/2021) (ks) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Modified on 1/25/2021 (ks).
|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, Memorandum of Law in Support and Unpublished Authorities served on Plaintiff on 12/28/20. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Alston & Bird LLP, Cathy Benton, Richard Hays, Lynn Nabors, Michael Stephens..(Jones, Jenna) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint. . Document filed by Alston & Bird LLP, Cathy Benton, Richard Hays, Lynn Nabors, Michael Stephens..(Cambria, John) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint. Document filed by Alston & Bird LLP, Cathy Benton, Richard Hays, Lynn Nabors, Michael Stephens..(Cambria, John) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jenna Jones on behalf of Alston & Bird LLP, Cathy Benton, Richard Hays, Lynn Nabors, Michael Stephens. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service).(Jones, Jenna) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Felix Cambria on behalf of Alston & Bird LLP, Cathy Benton, Richard Hays, Lynn Nabors, Michael Stephens. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service).(Cambria, John) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Cathy Benton, served on 12/7/2020, answer due 12/28/2020. Service was accepted by Vernon Bridges, Alston & Bird LLP. Document filed by Dawn M. Joyner. (sc) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Michael Stephens, served on 12/7/2020, answer due 12/28/2020. Service was accepted by Vernon Bridges, Alston & Bird LLP. Document filed by Dawn M. Joyner. (sc) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Richard Hays, served on 12/7/2020, answer due 12/28/2020. Service was accepted by Vernon Bridges, Alston & Bird LLP. Document filed by Dawn M. Joyner. (sc) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Alston & Bird LLP, served on 12/7/2020, answer due 12/28/2020. Service was accepted by Vernon Bridges, Alston & Bird LLP. Document filed by Dawn M. Joyner. (sc) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED.Summons and Complaint served. Lynn Nabors, served on 12/7/2020, answer due 12/28/2020. Service was accepted by Vernon Bridges, Alston & Bird LLP. Document filed by Dawn M. Joyner. (sc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alston & Bird LLP, Cathy Benton, Richard Hays, Lynn Nabors, Michael Stephens. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number 465401270568)Document filed by Dawn M. Joyner.(rdz) Modified on 12/3/2020 (rdz). |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) Modified on 12/3/2020 (rdz). |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Alston & Bird LLP, Cathy Benton, Richard Hays, Lynn Nabors, Michael Stephens..(rdz) Modified on 12/3/2020 (rdz). |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (rdz) Modified on 12/3/2020 (rdz). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
