Prisman GMBH v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Prisman GMBH |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and John Doe |
| 1:2020cv10200 |
| December 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Alison J Nathan |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 nr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION OF DISCONTINUANCE: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned attorneys for the Plaintiff and attorneys for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., being the attorneys for the parties who have appeared in this action, that the above-entitled action hereby is discontinued without prejudice and without costs to any party as against the others. This stipulation may be filed without further notice by the Clerk of the Court. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/11/2020) (cf) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Prisman GMBH. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Masberg, Moritz) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Moritz Masberg on behalf of Prisman GMBH..(Masberg, Moritz) |
| ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. #6 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Alison J. Nathan for approval for the following reason(s): the stipulation of dismissal is not pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (dt) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil is no longer assigned to the case..(wb) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Removal. Document filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A).(Daley, Althea) |
| Case Designated ECF. (dnh) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (dnh) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(dnh) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A...(Daley, Althea) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Daley, Althea) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 159169/2020. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-22875778).Document filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Redacted Summons with Notice, Complaint, and Subpoena Duces Tecum, #2 Exhibit B - Redacted Wire Order Instructions).(Daley, Althea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
