BURBERRY LIMITED v. VARIOUS JOHN DOES
| Burberry Limited, ABC, Louis Vuitton Malletier and Hermes International |
| Jane Does, XYZ Companies, DEF and Various John Does |
| 1:2020cv10286 |
| December 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Louis L Stanton |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1051 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 7/13/2021 in a court action filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (aea) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Jane Does, Various John Does, XYZ Companies. Document filed by Hermes International, Louis Vuitton Malletier, Burberry Limited. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Wallace, Kevin) |
| Filing 23 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, SEIZURE ORDER, SUBSTITUTE CUSTODIAN ORDER, EXPEDITED DISCOVERY ORDER, AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE BRINGING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Document filed by Burberry Limited, Hermes International, Louis Vuitton Malletier. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (jca) |
| Filing 22 AFFIDAVIT OF RAYMOND DOWD. Document filed by Burberry Limited, Hermes International, Louis Vuitton Malletier. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (jca) |
| Filing 21 PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR AN EX PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, SEIZURE ORDER, AND NOTICE SETTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING. Document filed by Burberry Limited, Hermes International, Louis Vuitton Malletier. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (jca) |
| Filing 20 DECLARATION OF ERIC LACOMA. Document filed by Louis Vuitton Malletier. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (jca) |
| Filing 19 DECLARATION OF JEAN-CLAUDE MASSON. Document filed by Hermes International. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (jca) |
| Filing 18 DECLARATION OF JENNIFER HALTER. Document filed by Burberry Limited. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (jca) |
| Filing 17 DECLARATION OF KEVIN M. WALLACE IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO FILE ACTION UNDER SEAL. Document filed by Burberry Limited, Hermes International, Louis Vuitton Malletier. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (jca) |
| Filing 16 DECLARATION OF KEVIN M. WALLACE. Document filed by Burberry Limited, Hermes International, Louis Vuitton Malletier. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (jca) |
| Filing 15 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Document filed by Louis Vuitton Malletier. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (jca) |
| Filing 14 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Document filed by HERMS INTERNATIONAL. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (jca) |
| Filing 13 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Document filed by Burberry Limited. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (jca) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (jca) |
| Filing 11 AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - ADDITIONAL PLEADING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following additional trademark(s) have been included in a court action filed in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (jca) |
| Filing 10 SECOND CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (jca) |
| Filing 9 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (jca) |
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT. Document filed by HERMS INTERNATIONAL;, Louis Vuitton Malletier, Burberry Limited. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (jca) |
Filing 7
ORDER SEALING THE FILE: NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED as follows that: Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1116(d)(8), pending the hearing of Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction and subject to modification by the judge to whom the case is assigned, the Clerk of this Court is to keep and maintain under seal all papers filed herein, and that public scrutiny of such papers shall not be permitted, subject to defendants' rights to access such papers upon presenting the Clerk of this Court with proper identification. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by docket entry 6.*** (Signed by Part One Judge Victor Marrero on 12/4/2020) (jca)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED as follows that:1. The seizures outlined in the opening paragraph are hereby confirmed, and the counterfeit goods seized pursuant to the Court's December 21, 2020 Preliminary Injunction &Seizure Order may be destroyed after the appropriate 10 days' notice is given to the United States Attorney for the Southern District ofNew York, as provided for in 15 U.S.C. 1118. 2. Service of this Order by first-class mail to the Defendants at their home or business addresses shall constitute sufficient service of this Order. Service shall be deemed complete on the mailing of this Order as permitted above. 3. The Clerk's Office shall unseal all papers under seal in this action. SO ORDERED: Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 01/04/2021)(nmo)
|
| Filing 5 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault..(jus) |
| Filing 4 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault..(nmo) |
| Filing 3 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault..(jus) |
| Filing 2 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault..(jus) |
|
Filing 1
***Sealed*** ORDER, Case sealed. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 12/04/2020) (jus)
|
| Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
