Sutton v. Amtrak
| James Sutton and Jamon Sutton |
| National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak, Amtrak also known as National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as AMTRAK and National Railroad Passenger Corporation |
| 1:2020cv10511 |
| December 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Valerie E Caproni |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CVI. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii): IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned attorneys for Plaintiff Jamon Sutton and Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak ("Amtrak"), that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action be dismissed with prejudice as to all claims, causes of action, and parties, with each party bearing that party's own attorney's fees and costs. This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED., Amtrak terminated. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 1/20/2021) (ama)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Amtrak and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Amtrak. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Bryan, Shayna) |
|
Filing 9
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #8 Letter filed by Jamon Sutton. ENDORSEMENT: Application GRANTED. Defendant's time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is adjourned to Friday, January 22, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 1/6/2021) (jca) Modified on 1/7/2021 (jca).
|
| Filing 8 LETTER addressed to Judge Valerie E. Caproni from Harvey Winer, Esq. dated January 6, 2021 re: Extending Defendant's Time to Answer. Document filed by Jamon Sutton..(Shapiro, Mitchell) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Mitchell George Shapiro on behalf of Jamon Sutton..(Shapiro, Mitchell) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: granting #4 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is adjourned to Friday, January 8, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 12/16/2020) (ama)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: In light of the COVID-19 situation, the Court will conduct the Initial Pretrial Conference ("IPTC") in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on January 29, 2021 at 12:00 p.m. by teleconference. At the scheduled time, counsel for all parties should call 888-363-4749, Access code 3121171#, Security code 0511. Counsel should submit their proposed case management plan and joint letter as outlined below. The parties are directed to submit a joint letter of no more than five pages byJanuary 21, 2021, addressing the following in separate paragraphs: as set forth herein. Plaintiff's counsel, or the defendant's counsel in removed cases, is responsible for distributing copies of this Notice to all parties. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 1/29/2021 at 12:00 PM before Judge Valerie E. Caproni. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 12/16/2020) (ama)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 1/8/2021 (ama) |
| Filing 4 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint addressed to Judge Valerie E. Caproni from Shayna Bryan dated December 15, 2020. Document filed by Amtrak..(Bryan, Shayna) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Valerie E. Caproni. Judge Analisa Torres is no longer assigned to the case..(wb) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sophia Ree on behalf of Amtrak..(Ree, Sophia) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Shayna Antoinette Bryan. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Amtrak. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: alias party name was omitted. (gp) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp) |
| Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of Bronx. Case Number: 33670/2020E. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-23002302).Document filed by National Railroad Passenger Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Verified Complaint).(Bryan, Shayna) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Bryan, Shayna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
