Fife v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
Plaintiff: John M. Fife
Defendant: Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2020cv10716
Filed: December 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2021 Filing 14 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc...(Mitchell, John)
February 15, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Patrick Mitchell on behalf of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc...(Mitchell, John)
February 12, 2021 Filing 12 LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Martin H. Kaplan dated February 12, 2021 re: Defendant's Pre-Motion Letter. Document filed by John M. Fife..(Parks, Kari)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. GRANTED. The initial pretrial conference scheduled for February 17, 2021, is ADJOURNED to March 2, 2021, at 11:40 a.m. By February 23, 2021, the parties shall submit their joint letter and proposed case management plan. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 3/2/2021 at 11:40 AM before Judge Analisa Torres. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/9/2021) (kv)
February 8, 2021 Filing 10 CONSENT LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Kari Parks dated February 8, 2021. Document filed by John M. Fife..(Parks, Kari)
February 5, 2021 Filing 9 LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from John P. Mitchell dated 02.05.2021 re: Request to File Notice of Motion to Dismiss. Document filed by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc...(Mitchell, John)
January 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effo1i to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendant shall, by February 10, 2021, e-mail a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/node/754 and attached to this order, to Orders_and_Judgments@nysd.uscourts.gov. If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge rather than before me. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this order. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so ordered. If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by February 10, 2021, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 1/5/2021) (ks)
January 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 1/5/2021) (kv)
January 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear for an initial pretrial conference, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, at 10:20 a.m. on February 17, 2021, to be held telephonically. The pa1ties are directed to dial 888-398-2342 or 215-861-0674, and enter access code 5598827. Principal trial counsel must appear at this and all subsequent conferences. Initial Conference set for 2/17/2021 at 10:20 AM before Judge Analisa Torres. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 1/5/2021) (kv)
December 21, 2020 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc...(pc)
December 21, 2020 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
December 21, 2020 Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
December 21, 2020 Case Designated ECF. (pc)
December 18, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Martin H. Kaplan on behalf of John M. Fife..(Kaplan, Martin)
December 18, 2020 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by John M. Fife..(Parks, Kari)
December 18, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Parks, Kari)
December 18, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-23104535)Document filed by John M. Fife..(Parks, Kari)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fife v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
Represented By: John Patrick Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John M. Fife
Represented By: Martin H. Kaplan
Represented By: Kari Parks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?