Makhsudova v. City of New York et al
| Sadokat Makhsudova |
| Sergeant Cordero, Juan Duran, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Sergeant Pendelton, Kenny Kong, Sergeant Alfredo Ruiz, City Of New York and Sergeant Ruiz Alfredo |
| 1:2020cv10728 |
| December 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Sergeant Ruiz Alfredo, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Sadokat Makhsudova..(Bellovin, Marshall)
|
|
Filing 7
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Sergeant Cordero, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Sadokat Makhsudova..(Bellovin, Marshall)
|
|
Filing 6
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Sergeant Pendelton, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Sadokat Makhsudova..(Bellovin, Marshall)
|
|
Filing 5
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Administrative Lieutenant Kenny Kong, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Sadokat Makhsudova..(Bellovin, Marshall)
|
|
Filing 4
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to New York City Police Department ("NYPD") Inspector Juan Duran, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Sadokat Makhsudova..(Bellovin, Marshall)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The City of New York, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Sadokat Makhsudova..(Bellovin, Marshall)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (pc)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Marshall Benjamin Bellovin. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Alfredo Ruiz, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Juan Duran, Kenny Kong. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party name was entered in all caps; party text was omitted;. (pc)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Marshall Benjamin Bellovin. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $6,000,000,000;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to $6,000,000;. (pc)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Bellovin, Marshall)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Cordero, Juan Duran, Kenny Kong, Pendelton, Alfredo Ruiz, THE CITY OF NEW YORK. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number BNYSDC-23108103)Document filed by Sadokat Makhsudova..(Bellovin, Marshall)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
