Securities and Exchange Commission v. Samel
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Charles Samel
Case Number: 1:2020cv10769
Filed: December 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Denise L Cote
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Initial Conference and Individual Practices served on Charles Samel on 2/17/21. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission..(Moilanen, Lindsay)
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. By the date of the pretrial conference counsel for all parties are required to register as filing users in accordance with the Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. Counsel for all parties are directed to appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court, at the time and place listed below. DATE OF CONFERENCE: March 18, 2021 at 10:00 am. Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the conference will be held telephonically. The parties shall use the following dial-in credentials for the telephone conference: Dial-in: 888-363-4749; Access code: 4324948. The parties shall use a landline if one is available. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 3/18/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Denise L. Cote. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 2/16/2021) (ama)
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION AND ORDER: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED that: The date by which Defendant Charles Samel must serve an answer or other response to the complaint is adjourned from February 19, 2021 until March 12, 2021. SO ORDERED., Charles Samel answer due 3/12/2021., Motions terminated: #9 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Denise L. Cote from Robert S. Landy dated February 16, 2021. filed by Charles Samel. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 2/16/2021) (ama)
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Denise L. Cote from Robert S. Landy dated February 16, 2021. Document filed by Charles Samel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1).(Landy, Robert)
December 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Adam C. Ford on behalf of Charles Samel..(Ford, Adam)
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Denise L. Cote. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (laq)
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (laq)
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:20-cv-05496-DLC.(laq)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Charles Samel waiver sent on 12/21/2020, answer due 2/19/2021. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission..(Fortino, Philip)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Robert Seabrook Landy on behalf of Charles Samel..(Landy, Robert)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (dnh)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE REFERRED TO Judge Denise L. Cote as possibly related to 1:20-cv-05496-DLC. (dnh)
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. .(dnh)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Philip Andrew Fortino on behalf of Securities and Exchange Commission..(Fortino, Philip)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lindsay Senechal Moilanen on behalf of Securities and Exchange Commission..(Moilanen, Lindsay)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 20-cv-5496. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission..(Michael, Daniel)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Michael, Daniel)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charles Samel. Document filed by Securities and Exchange Commission..(Michael, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Samel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Samel
Represented By: Robert Seabrook Landy
Represented By: Adam C. Ford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: Lindsay Senechal Moilanen
Represented By: Daniel Michael
Represented By: Philip Andrew Fortino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?