In re: Grand Capital Asset Management Ltd.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District In re: Grand Capital Asset Management Ltd.

In re: Grand Capital Asset Management Ltd.

Case Number:	1:2020mc00215
Filed:	May 29, 2020
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
Nature of Suit:	Other
Cause of Action:	M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 27, 2020	Filing 10 ORDER granting 8 EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE ADDITIONAL THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS: Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUGED as follows: 1. The Application is GRANTED. 2. Any Discovery taken pursuant to this Order will be governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3. The Applicant's request for leave to conduct discovery including, but not limited to, leave to serve subpoenas in substantially similar form as the form attached to the Declara tion of Thomas Vandenabeele and to take testimony is GRANTED. 4. The Applicant's request to be appointed as the person with the power to administer any necessary oath and take testimony or a statement is GRANTED. 5. The Addit ional Respondents are ordered to preserve all relevant and potentially relevant evidence in their possession, custody or control until such time as Applicant communicates to them that the preservation is no longer necessary or until further order of this Court. 6. Applicant is further authorized to issue and serve additional follow-up subpoenas on the Additional Respondents or third parties as may be necessary to obtain the documentary and testi monial evidence for use in the Contemplated Proceeding. 7. Applicant is not required to serve the Application upon Gulf Technical, the Discovery Subjects and the Respondents as defined in the Declaration of James Fox (DE#2), an d the Additional Respondents. 8. Applicant is not required to serve this Order or subpoenas to the Additional Respondents upon Gulf Technical and the Discovery Subjects. 9. Nothing in this Order should be construe d to prevent or otherwise foreclose Applicant from seeking modification of this Order or leave of Court to serve any additional subpoena on a person or entity. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 8/27/2020) (js)
May 29, 2020	Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1782 granting 1 Letter Motion for Discovery. It is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: The Application is GRANTED. Any Discovery taken pursuant to this Order wil l be governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Applicant's request for leave to conduct discovery including, but not limited to, leave to serve subpoenas in substantially similar form as the form attached to the Application and to take testimony is GRANTED. The Applicant's request to be appointed as the person with the power to administer any necessary oath and take testimony or a statement is GRANTED. The Respondents are ordered to preserve all relevant and potentially relevant evidence in their possession, custody or control until such time as Applicant communicates to them that the preservation is no longer necessary or until further order of this Court. Applicant is further authorized to issue and serve add itional follow-up subpoenas on the Respondents or third parties as may be necessary to obtain the documentary and testimonial evidence for use in the Contemplated Proceeding. Applicant is not required to serve the Application upon Gulf Technical, the Discovery Subjects, as defined in the Declaration of James Fox, and the Respondents. Applicant is not required to serve this Order or subpoenas to the Respondents upon Gulf Technical and the Discovery Subjects. Nothing in this Order should be construed to prevent or otherwise foreclose Applicant from seeking modification of this Order or leave of Court to serve any additional subpoena on a person or entity. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 5/29/20) (yv)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 27, 2020

Filing 10 ORDER granting 8 EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE ADDITIONAL THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS: Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUGED as follows: 1. The Application is GRANTED. 2. Any Discovery taken pursuant to this Order will be governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3. The Applicant's request for leave to conduct discovery including, but not limited to, leave to serve subpoenas in substantially similar form as the form attached to the Declara tion of Thomas Vandenabeele and to take testimony is GRANTED. 4. The Applicant's request to be appointed as the person with the power to administer any necessary oath and take testimony or a statement is GRANTED. 5. The Addit ional Respondents are ordered to preserve all relevant and potentially relevant evidence in their possession, custody or control until such time as Applicant communicates to them that the preservation is no longer necessary or until further order of this Court. 6. Applicant is further authorized to issue and serve additional follow-up subpoenas on the Additional Respondents or third parties as may be necessary to obtain the documentary and testi monial evidence for use in the Contemplated Proceeding. 7. Applicant is not required to serve the Application upon Gulf Technical, the Discovery Subjects and the Respondents as defined in the Declaration of James Fox (DE#2), an d the Additional Respondents. 8. Applicant is not required to serve this Order or subpoenas to the Additional Respondents upon Gulf Technical and the Discovery Subjects. 9. Nothing in this Order should be construe d to prevent or otherwise foreclose Applicant from seeking modification of this Order or leave of Court to serve any additional subpoena on a person or entity. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 8/27/2020) (js)

May 29, 2020

Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1782 granting 1 Letter Motion for Discovery. It is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: The Application is GRANTED. Any Discovery taken pursuant to this Order wil l be governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Applicant's request for leave to conduct discovery including, but not limited to, leave to serve subpoenas in substantially similar form as the form attached to the Application and to take testimony is GRANTED. The Applicant's request to be appointed as the person with the power to administer any necessary oath and take testimony or a statement is GRANTED. The Respondents are ordered to preserve all relevant and potentially relevant evidence in their possession, custody or control until such time as Applicant communicates to them that the preservation is no longer necessary or until further order of this Court. Applicant is further authorized to issue and serve add itional follow-up subpoenas on the Respondents or third parties as may be necessary to obtain the documentary and testimonial evidence for use in the Contemplated Proceeding. Applicant is not required to serve the Application upon Gulf Technical, the Discovery Subjects, as defined in the Declaration of James Fox, and the Respondents. Applicant is not required to serve this Order or subpoenas to the Respondents upon Gulf Technical and the Discovery Subjects. Nothing in this Order should be construed to prevent or otherwise foreclose Applicant from seeking modification of this Order or leave of Court to serve any additional subpoena on a person or entity. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 5/29/20) (yv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re: Grand Capital Asset Management Ltd.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?