F.M. et al v. New York City Department of Education
| F. M. |
| New York City Department of Education |
| 1:2021cv00020 |
| January 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Valerie E Caproni |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1415 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii): NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties, through the undersigned, as follows: In consideration of payment of the sum set forth in paragraph "2" below, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), without fees, costs, or expenses in excess of the amount specified in paragraph "2". The City of New York shall pay TWENTY-SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($26,000.00) in full satisfaction of all claims for attorney's fees, costs, and expenses, incurred or accrued in connections with N.S.'s 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 school years, including Impartial Hearing Case No. 185458 and the instant federal action. This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 6/16/2021) (ama)
|
| Filing 15 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by New York City Department of Education..(Forster, Ian) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ian William Forster on behalf of New York City Department of Education..(Forster, Ian) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #8 Amended Complaint. Document filed by New York City Department of Education..(Koroleva, Lana) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application GRANTED. The initial pretrial conference currently scheduled for April 2, 2021 is adjourned sine die. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is due no later than Thursday, July 1, 2021, Defendant's response in opposition is due no later than Thursday, July 22, 2021, and Plaintiff's reply in support is due no later than Tuesday, August 3, 2021. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 3/12/2021) (ks)
|
| Filing 11 FIRST LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference sine die and proposed brief schedule addressed to Judge Valerie E. Caproni from Plaintiffs dated March 12, 2021. Document filed by F. M., F. M...(Murray, Erin) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 7/1/2021. Responses due by 7/22/2021 Replies due by 8/3/2021. (ks) |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to New York City Department of Education..(gp) |
| Filing 9 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to New York City Department of Education, re: #8 Amended Complaint. Document filed by F. M., F. M...(Murray, Erin) |
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #1 Complaint against New York City Department of Education.Document filed by F. M., F. M.. Related document: #1 Complaint..(Murray, Erin) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants' time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is hereby adjourned to Friday, March 26, 2021. New York City Department of Education answer due 3/26/2021. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 1/25/2021) (mro)
|
| Filing 6 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Valerie E. Caproni from Lana Koroleva dated January 22, 2021. Document filed by New York City Department of Education..(Koroleva, Lana) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE FOR CASES FILED UNDER 20 U.S.C. 1415(i)(3): Counsel for all parties are directed to appear before the undersigned for an Initial Pretrial Conference ("IPTC") in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on April 2, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 443 of the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York, 10007. No later than March 12, 2021, the parties must submit a joint letter stating whether the initial pre-trial conference would be helpful in expeditiously managing this case or whether, in the alternative, they would prefer that the Court forgo the IPTC and set a schedule for briefing a motion by Plaintiff for summary judgment after Defendant has answered. If theparties would prefer to forgo an IPTC and set a summary-judgment briefing schedule, they must propose such a schedule in their letter. The parties' letter must also state whether they jointly believe that participation in the free, court-annexed mediation program or a referral to the assigned Magistrate Judge for settlement discussions would be beneficial to reaching a mediatedresolution of this matter. Plaintiffs are encouraged to serve defendants promptly. The parties must append to their joint preconference letter a jointly proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order. Plaintiff's counsel, or Defendant's counsel in removed cases, is responsible for distributing copies of this Notice to all parties. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 4/2/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 443, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Valerie E. Caproni. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 1/06/2021) (ama)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to New York City Department of Education..(pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Valerie E. Caproni. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Murray, Erin) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to New York City Department of Education, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by F. M., F. M...(Murray, Erin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against New York City Department of Education. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-23335038)Document filed by F. M., F. M...(Murray, Erin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: F.M. et al v. New York City Department of Education | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: New York City Department of Education | |
| Represented By: | Lana Koroleva |
| Represented By: | Ian William Forster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: F. M. | |
| Represented By: | Erin Elizabeth Murray |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
