White v. Capra
Petitioner: Ajamu White
Respondent: Michael Capra
Case Number: 1:2021cv00132
Filed: January 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Ona T Wang
Referring Judge: Gregory H Woods
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2021 Filing 12 LETTER addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Margaret A. Cieprisz and Ajamu White dated February 10, 2021 re: ECF Docket No. 10. Document filed by Michael Capra..(Cieprisz, Margaret)
February 3, 2021 Filing 11 LETTER addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Ajamu White, dated 1/27/21 re: The packet which was sent to me included copies of my submissions except a copy of my request for counsel per the CJA 18:3006(A)(2) (B). I do not know if that was received and filed and forgotten to be copied. Included with this letter is a copy of my original request(as indicated). Document filed by Ajamu White.(sc)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 1/24/2021) (mro)
January 22, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Margaret Ann Cieprisz on behalf of Michael Capra..(Cieprisz, Margaret)
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 HABEAS PACKAGE MAILED to Ajamu White 13-A-5415 Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, NY 10562, at, on 1/15/2021 Re: #6 Order to Answer. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, order granting IFP application, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge. (aan)
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Habeas Corpus. Referred to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 1/14/2021) (jca)
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO ANSWER, 28 U.S.C. 2254: Having examined this petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254, the Court hereby ORDERS that: The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order and of the petition on the Attorney General of the State of New York by certified mail to 28 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10005; and on the District Attorney of New York by certified mail to One Hogan Place, New York, New York 10013. Within sixty days of the date of this order, Respondent shall file and serve (1) an answer to the petition and (2) the transcripts and briefs identified in Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Petitioner may file and serve reply papers, if any, within thirty days from the date he is served with Respondent's answer. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 1/14/2021) (jca) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
January 14, 2021 Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (laq)
January 14, 2021 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (laq)
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 1/13/2021) (vn) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
January 7, 2021 Filing 3 PRISONER AUTHORIZATION. Document filed by Ajamu White..(rdz)
January 7, 2021 Filing 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Document filed by Ajamu White..(rdz)
January 7, 2021 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Ajamu White..(rdz)
January 7, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (rdz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White v. Capra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Capra
Represented By: Margaret Ann Cieprisz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ajamu White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?