Hess v. Alibaba Group Holding Limited et al
| Elissa Hess, as Trustee for the EH Living Trust and Elissa Hess |
| Daniel Zhang, Alibaba Group Holding Limited and Maggie Wu |
| Thomas J. Popovich |
| 1:2021cv00136 |
| January 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| George B Daniels |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER: The initial conference is adjourned from March 11, 2021 to April 27, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 3/3/2021) ( Initial Conference set for 4/27/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge George B. Daniels.) (ks)
|
|
Filing 19
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT: NOW, THEREFORE, THE UNDERSIGNED PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEYS AND SUBJECT TO THE COURT'S APPROVAL, STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Defendants Zhang and Wu waive service under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d); 2. Defendants need not answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the above-captioned action or to any other complaint that is filed or consolidated with the above-captioned action prior to the appointment of Lead Plaintiff; 3. Within ten (10) days after this Court appoints a Lead Plaintiff, the parties will meet and confer and submit to the Court a proposed schedule for the filing of a consolidated amended complaint or designation of a previously-filed complaint as the operative complaint, Defendants' responses thereto, and all briefing associated with any motion(s) to dismiss; and 4. By entering into this stipulation, the parties do not waive, but rather expressly preserve, all rights and defenses they may have in this action, including, without limitation, any personal jurisdiction defenses. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 1/28/2021) (jwh)
|
| Filing 18 LETTER addressed to Judge George B. Daniels from Stephen Blake dated January 27, 2021 re: Time to Respond to Complaint. Document filed by Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Maggie Wu, Daniel Zhang. (Attachments: #1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint).(Blake, Stephen) |
| Filing 17 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Other Affiliate SoftBank Group Corp. for Alibaba Group Holding Limited. Document filed by Alibaba Group Holding Limited..(Blake, Stephen) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Brooke Elizabeth Cucinella on behalf of Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Maggie Wu, Daniel Zhang..(Cucinella, Brooke) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jonathan K. Youngwood on behalf of Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Maggie Wu, Daniel Zhang..(Youngwood, Jonathan) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by James Glenn Kreissman on behalf of Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Maggie Wu, Daniel Zhang..(Kreissman, James) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Stephen Patrick Blake on behalf of Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Maggie Wu, Daniel Zhang..(Blake, Stephen) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Notice of Movant Thomas J. Popovich's Non-Opposition to Competing Motions for Lead Plaintiff. Document filed by Thomas J. Popovich..(Fox, Frederic) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Alibaba Group Holding Limited served on 1/11/2021, answer due 2/1/2021. Service was accepted by Joey Merced, Service of Process Intake Clerk, Corporation Service Company. Document filed by Elissa Hess..(Rudman, Samuel) |
|
Filing 10
INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Counsel for all parties are hereby directed to attend a conference at the time and place fixed below, for the purpose of Case Management and scheduling pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16. You are directed to furnish all attorneys in this action with copies of this order and enclosures, and to furnish chambers with a copy of any transmittal letter(s). If you are unaware of the identity of counsel for any of the parties, you must forthwith send a copy of the notice and rules to that party personally. An Initial pretrial conference will be held on Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, Courtroom 11A. So Ordered. ( Initial Conference set for 3/11/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 11A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge George B. Daniels.) (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 1/14/21) (yv)
|
| ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER. Document No. #9 Proposed Order was reviewed and approved as to form. (km) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (laq) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge George B. Daniels. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (laq) |
| CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:20-cv-09568-GBD. Notice of Assignment to follow. (laq) |
| Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by Thomas J. Popovich..(Fox, Frederic) Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. |
| Filing 8 DECLARATION of Frederic S. Fox in Support re: #6 MOTION to Appoint Thomas J. Popovich to serve as lead plaintiff(s) .. Document filed by Thomas J. Popovich. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - November 13, 2020 Notice of Pendency of Ciccarello v. Alibaba Group Holding Limited, 20-cv-09568 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 13, 2020) on Business Wire, #2 Exhibit B - Sworn Certification of Mr. Popovich pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, #3 Exhibit C - Chart calculating the losses incurred by Mr. Popovich prepared by counsel, #4 Exhibit D - Firm resume of Kaplan Fox).(Fox, Frederic) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #6 MOTION to Appoint Thomas J. Popovich to serve as lead plaintiff(s) . . Document filed by Thomas J. Popovich..(Fox, Frederic) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Thomas J. Popovich to serve as lead plaintiff(s) . Document filed by Thomas J. Popovich..(Fox, Frederic) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Maggie Wu, Daniel Zhang..(pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Samuel Howard Rudman. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Elissa Hess, as Trustee for the EH Living Trust. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. .(pc) |
| CASE REFERRED TO Judge George B. Daniels as possibly related to 20cv9568. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Filing 4 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 20-cv-9568. Document filed by Elissa Hess, as Trustee for the EH Living Trust..(Rudman, Samuel) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Daniel Zhang and Maggie Wu, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Elissa Hess, as Trustee for the EH Living Trust..(Rudman, Samuel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rudman, Samuel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Maggie Wu, Daniel Zhang. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-23403656)Document filed by Elissa Hess, as Trustee for the EH Living Trust..(Rudman, Samuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
