Claudio v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
| Misael Lopez Claudio |
| United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) |
| 1:2021cv00202 |
| January 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Respondent's status letter dated February 26, 2021 (ECF No. 10) served on Misael Lopez Claudio on February 26, 2021. Service was made by Certified Mail. Document filed by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)..(Waterman, Brandon) |
| Filing 10 LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Brandon M. Waterman dated February 26, 2021 re: Case Updates. Document filed by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)..(Waterman, Brandon) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Respondent's January 29, 2021 Letter (ECF No. 8) served on Misael Lopez Claudio on February 2, 2021. Service was made by Certified Mail. Document filed by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)..(Waterman, Brandon) |
| Filing 8 LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Brandon M. Waterman dated January 29, 2021 re: Status letter pursuant to the Court's order of January 19, 2021 (ECF No. 5). Document filed by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)..(Waterman, Brandon) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Brandon Matthew Waterman on behalf of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)..(Waterman, Brandon) |
Filing 6
INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Misael Lopez Claudio, 08-A-3639, at Sullivan C.F. P.O. Box 116 325 Riverside Drive Fallsburg, NY 12733-0116, on 1/20/2021 Re: #5 Order to Answer, 28 U.S.C. 2241. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge. (sha)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO ANSWER, 28 U.S.C. 2241... The Court has examined the petition in this action, which Petitioner filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Accordingly, The Clerk of Court shall electronically notify the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York that this Order has been issued. Within sixty days of the date of this order, the U.S. Attorney's Office shall file an answer or other pleadings in response to the petition. Petitioner may file reply papers, if any, within thirty days from the date Petitioner is served with Respondent's answer. By January 29, 2021, the U.S. Attorney's Office shall file a letter updating the Court on its investigations into Petitioner's status as a United States citizen. SO ORDERED. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) answer due on 3/22/2021. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 1/19/2021) (kv) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
|
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vba) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Analisa Torres. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 1/14/2021) (vn) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. (vn).
|
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Document filed by Misael Lopez Claudio..(rdz) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Misael Lopez Claudio..(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Claudio v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Misael Lopez Claudio | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) | |
| Represented By: | Brandon Matthew Waterman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
