Genao v. City of New York et al
| Gabino Genao |
| ESU Capt. Moise, City of New York, DOC Commissioner Brann, ESU Officer Nwosu, Cohall, ESU Officer Freemantle, Sonya Harvey and ESU Captain McCarthy |
| 1:2021cv00301 |
| January 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Debra C Freeman |
| Analisa Torres |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Gabino Genao NYSID: 04570951M B&C No. 1131700734 Manhattan Detention Center 125 White Street New York, NY 10013, at, on 3/11/2021 Re: #14 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, order granting IFP application, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge. (aan)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER OF SERVICE: The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. The Clerk of Court is directed to electronically notify the New York City Department of Correction and the New York City Law Department of this order. The Court requests that Defendants the City of New York, Assistant Deputy Warden of MDC Sonya Harvey, ESU Officer Nwosu, ESU Officer Freemantle, MDC Captain Cohall, ESU Captain Moise, ESU Captain McCarthy, and DOC Commissioner Cynthia Brannwaive service of summons. Local Civil Rule 33.2 applies to this action. SO ORDERED. Waiver of Service due by 4/12/2021. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/11/2021) (kv) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/11/2021) (kv)
|
|
Case Designated Local Rule 33.2. (dmg)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION IN PRISONER CASE: The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order and the prisoner authorization to the agency having custody of Plaintiff. That agency is directed to forward copies of Plaintiff's prison trust fund account for the past six months and to disburse the payments required under 28 U.S.C. 1915 to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and to include the above docket number on the disbursement before sending it to the Court. If Plaintiff is transferred to another facility, the current facility shall provide a copy of this order to the facility to which Plaintiff is transferred. The Clerk of Court is also directed to send a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. Finally, it is Plaintiff's obligation to promptly submit a written notification to the Court if Plaintiff's address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 3/10/2021) (vn) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so redesignated. (ad)
|
|
CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:21-cv-00303-AT-DCF. Notice of Assignment to follow. (ad)
|
|
Mailed a copy of #11 Order Granting IFP Application in Prisoner Case, to Warden/Superintendent of Manhattan Detention Center, 125 White Street, New York, NY 10013. (dsh)
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Analisa Torres. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (ad)
|
|
Filing 10
LETTER from G. Genao, dated 3/2/21 re: "SECOND REQUEST OF ASSISTANCE FOR SUBPOENA"- I am submitting a letter motion asking for the Court to assist me in successfully serving the defendants with subpoena to produce documents, information or objects or to permit inspection of premises in a civil action etc. Document filed by Gabino Genao.(sc)
|
|
Filing 9
LETTER from G. Genao, dated 3/1/21 re: I am requesting to have a conference with defense counsel for the above referenced dockets for the purpose of status of complaint. I wish to speak to each defense counsel and have a meaningful dialogue in resolving and issuing the summons etc. Document filed by Gabino Genao.(sc)
|
|
Filing 8
LETTER from G. Genao, dated 2/28/21 re: I am submitting this letter in the best interest of justice. I would like to know whether defense counsel for the following dockets has video footage of incidents and would like for the defense to disclose this information within thirty days of this letter. Video footage is the best way for me to prove my claims as well as show defendants' neglect, failure to intervene etc. Document filed by Gabino Genao.(sc)
|
|
Filing 7
LETTER from G. Genao, dated 2/16/21 re: I am submitting this motion as I seek assistance in protecting and enforcing my federal constitutional rights etc. I am involved in extensive federal litigation against NYC DOC employees of whom I am in custody. I have been contacting the Records Access Officer since August of 2020 requesting FOIL information that has not been granted to me, records which I am being denied in violation of my FOIL rights etc. Document filed by Gabino Genao.(sc)
|
|
Filing 6
LETTER from G. Genao, dated 2/13/21 re: "REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE" - I received and sent back the subpoena requests for the mentioned dockets above. I was granted IFP and am requesting the Court's assistance with the order of service on these four subpoenas. Document filed by Gabino Genao.(sc)
|
|
Request for Subpoena Mailed: Request for 1 Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises, from Gabino Genao mailed on 1/26/2021. (sha)
|
|
Filing 5
LETTER from G. Genao, dated 1/24/21 re: "REQUEST FOR SUBPOENA OF CAMERA FOOTAGE" - In the best interests of justice I would like for the judge to subpoena camera footage from 9 South from 12/11/20 7am-3pm to 12/17/20 3pm-11 pm, and notify Plaintiff of all electronic storage files pertaining to this complaint etc. Document filed by Harvey, Gabino Genao.(sc)
|
|
Request for Subpoena Received: Re (5 in 1:21-cv-00301-UA, 5 in 1:21-cv-00303-UA) Letter,. Request for Subpoena of camera footage from G. Genao received on 1/24/21. Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing. (sc)
|
|
Filing 4
LETTER from G. Genao, dated 1/20/21 re: "DUPLICATE DOCKET"- I would like to inform you that the above referenced dockets are the same. They have the same defendants listed. Please correct this issue and delete one so that there is no confusion going forward. Document filed by Gabino Genao.(sc)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER AUTHORIZATION. Document filed by Gabino Genao..(rdz)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against Brann, City of New York, Cohall, Freemantle, Sonya Harvey, McCarthy, Moise, Nwosu. Document filed by Gabino Genao..(rdz)
|
|
Filing 1
REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Gabino Genao..(rdz)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (rdz)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
