Pearson v. Slack Technologies, Inc. et al
Blake Pearson |
Andrew Braccia, Sarah Friar, Graham Smith, Sheila B. Jordan, Michael M. McNamara, Slack Technologies, Inc., salesforce.com, inc., John O'Farrell, Stewart Butterfield, Skyline Strategies II LLC, Edith Cooper and Skyline Strategies I Inc. |
1:2021cv00335 |
January 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Jesse M Furman |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff Blake Pearson ("Plaintiff") voluntarily dismisses the claims in the captioned action (the "Action") without prejudice. Because this notice of dismissal is being filed with the Court before service by defendants of either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff's dismissal of the Action is effective upon the filing of this notice. All conferences are canceled, all motions are moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 3/3/21) (yv) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Andrew Braccia, Stewart Butterfield, Edith Cooper, Sarah Friar, Sheila B. Jordan, Michael M. McNamara, John O'Farrell, Skyline Strategies I Inc., Skyline Strategies II LLC, Slack Technologies, Inc., Graham Smith, salesforce.com, inc.. Document filed by Blake Pearson. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)..(Rowley, Shane) Modified on 3/2/2021 (dt). |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on April 21, 2021 at 3:45 p.m. in Courtroom 1105 of the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, New York. All counsel are required to register promptly as filing users on ECF and to familiarize themselves with the SDNY ECF Rules & Instructions, which are available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing. All counsel must also familiarize themselves with the Court's Individual Rules, which are available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman. Absent leave of Court obtained by letter-motion filed before the conference, all pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve as principal trial counsel. Additionally, in accordance with Paragraph 2.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices, the parties are hereby ORDERED to file on ECF a joint letter, described below, as well as a proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order attached as an exhibit to the joint letter, no later than Thursday of the week prior to the initial pretrial conference. The parties shall use this Court's form Proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, which is also available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman. Any open legal issues can be addressed at the conference.The joint letter shall not exceed five (5) pages, and shall provide the following information in separate paragraphs as further set forth in this Order. Counsel who have entered a notice of appearance as of the issuance of this order are directed (1) to notify counsel for all other parties in this action who have not yet appeared by serving upon each of them a copy of this order and the Court's Individual Rules and Practices forthwith, and (2) to file proof of such notice with the Court. If unaware of the identity of counsel for any of the parties, counsel receiving this order must forthwith send a copy of this order and the Court's Individual Rules and Practices to that party personally. SO ORDERED. ( Initial Conference set for 4/21/2012 at 03:45 PM in Courtroom 1105, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Jesse M. Furman.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 1/15/21) (yv) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jesse M. Furman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rowley, Shane) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Braccia, Stewart Butterfield, Edith Cooper, Sarah Friar, Sheila B. Jordan, Michael M. McNamara, John O'Farrell, Skyline Strategies I Inc., Skyline Strategies II LLC, Slack Technologies, Inc., Graham Smith, salesforce.com, inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-23513460)Document filed by Blake Pearson..(Rowley, Shane) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.