BITRO Group Inc. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Plaintiff: BITRO Group Inc.
Defendant: Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. doing business as Contech Lighting
Case Number: 1:2021cv01510
Filed: February 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lorna G Schofield
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting in part and denying in part #11 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. The application is GRANTED in part. The initial pre-trial conference scheduled for April 22, 2021, is adjourned to May 13, 2021, at 11:00 a.m., on the following conference call line: 888-363-4749, access code 558-3333. The time of the conference is approximate but the parties shall be ready to proceed by that time. The parties are reminded that their joint letter and proposed case management plan are due seven days before the conference. No further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances, which do not include settlement discussions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 4/2/2021) Initial Conference set for 5/13/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Lorna G. Schofield. (ks)
April 1, 2021 Filing 11 CONSENT LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Michael F. Sarney dated April 1, 2021. Document filed by BITRO Group Inc...(Sarney, Michael)
March 23, 2021 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Order served on Leviton Manufacturing Co. Inc. on March 15, 2021. Document filed by BITRO Group Inc...(Sarney, Michael)
March 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: The conference will be telephonic. The time of the conference is approximate, but the parties shall be ready to proceed by that time. (And as further set forth herein.) Initial Conference set for 4/22/2021 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 1106, Thurgood Marshal Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Lorna G. Schofield. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 3/11/2021) (jca)
February 22, 2021 Filing 8 AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(jgo)
February 22, 2021 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc...(jgo)
February 22, 2021 Case Eligible for Patent Pilot Program. (jgo)
February 22, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
February 22, 2021 Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
February 22, 2021 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lorna G. Schofield. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
February 19, 2021 Filing 6 AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Sarney, Michael)
February 19, 2021 Filing 5 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Sarney, Michael) Modified on 2/22/2021 (jgo).
February 19, 2021 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. d/b/a Contech Lighting, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by BITRO Group Inc...(Sarney, Michael)
February 19, 2021 Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by BITRO Group Inc...(Sarney, Michael)
February 19, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Sarney, Michael)
February 19, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24005959)Document filed by BITRO Group Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B).(Sarney, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BITRO Group Inc. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BITRO Group Inc.
Represented By: Michael F Sarney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. doing business as Contech Lighting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?