Grande v. 48 Rockefeller Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Ricardo Grande
Defendant: Byung W Cho and 48 Rockefeller Corp. doing business as Delis 48
Case Number: 1:2021cv01593
Filed: February 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: James L Cott
Referring Judge: Paul G Gardephe
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FOR CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO RULE 16: The Court shall hold an initial case management conference in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(a), on May 11, 2021 at 12:00 p.m. by telephone. Counsel should contact chambers using the Court's conference line, (877) 873-8017 (Access Code: 5277586). If the parties wish to be referred to the Court Mediation Program immediately, in advance of the Rule 16 conference, they should so advise the Court no later than May 4, 2021, at which time the Court will make such a referral and adjourn the conference sine die, and as further set forth in this Order. So ordered. (Initial Conference set for 5/11/2021 at 12:00 PM before Magistrate Judge James L. Cott.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 4/21/2021) (rjm)
April 19, 2021 Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by 48 Rockefeller Corp., Byung W Cho..(Ji, Younghoon)
April 19, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Younghoon Ji on behalf of 48 Rockefeller Corp., Byung W Cho..(Ji, Younghoon)
April 19, 2021 Filing 11 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by 48 Rockefeller Corp., Byung W Cho..(Ji, Younghoon)
April 7, 2021 Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. 48 Rockefeller Corp. served on 3/29/2021, answer due 4/19/2021. Document filed by Ricardo Grande..(Lee, C.K.)
March 19, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anne Melissa Seelig on behalf of Ricardo Grande..(Seelig, Anne)
February 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 2/27/2021) (rjm)
February 24, 2021 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Byung W Cho..(jgo)
February 24, 2021 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to 48 Rockefeller Corp...(jgo)
February 24, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
February 24, 2021 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
February 24, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney C.K. Lee. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Ricardo Grande. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (jgo)
February 24, 2021 Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
February 23, 2021 Filing 5 CONSENT TO SUE UNDER THE F.L.S.A.. Document filed by Ricardo Grande..(Lee, C.K.)
February 23, 2021 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Byung W. Cho, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Ricardo Grande..(Lee, C.K.)
February 23, 2021 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to 48 Rockefeller Corp., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Ricardo Grande..(Lee, C.K.)
February 23, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Lee, C.K.)
February 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 48 Rockefeller Corp., Byung W Cho. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24045206)Document filed by Ricardo Grande..(Lee, C.K.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grande v. 48 Rockefeller Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Byung W Cho
Represented By: Younghoon Ji
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 48 Rockefeller Corp. doing business as Delis 48
Represented By: Younghoon Ji
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ricardo Grande
Represented By: C.K. Lee
Represented By: Anne Melissa Seelig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?