Herrera v. Trump et al
Christopher William Herrera |
John Roberts, Donald Trump, Nancy Pelosi, United States of America, William Barr and Charles Grasley |
1:2021cv01671 |
February 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Colleen McMahon |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Mailed a copy of #5 Order of Dismissal, #6 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), to Christopher William Herrera, DIN 03-A-6195 at Green Haven Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 4000, Stormville, NY 12582-4000. (Attachments: # 1 PRO SE APPEAL PACKAGE) (dsh) |
Filing 6 CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to submit a completed prisoner authorization or pay the $402.00 in filing fees. See 28 U.S.C. 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 4/5/21) (Attachments: #1 PRO SE APPEAL PACKAGE) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. |
Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 4/5/21) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. |
Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING PRISONER AUTHORIZATION: The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. Plaintiff is directed to submit a completed and signed Prisoner Authorization form to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Prisoner Authorization form due by 3/29/2021. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 2/26/2021) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Authorization) (ees) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. |
Mailed a copy of #4 Order Directing Prisoner Authorization, to Christopher William Herrera, DIN 03-A-6195 at Green Haven Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 4000, Stormville, NY 12582-4000. (Attachments: # 1 Prisoner Authorization) (dsh) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(wb) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET.(rdz) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against William Barr, Charles Grasley, Nancy Pelosi, John Roberts, Donald Trump, United States of America. Document filed by Christopher William Herrera. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit).(rdz) |
Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Christopher William Herrera..(rdz) |
Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.