Smith v. Annucci et al.
| Jane Smith |
| Unidentified Officer, John Shipley, Officer A, Christian Nunez, Grievance Supervisor, Jason Effman, Officer D, Anthony J. Annucci, Captain B, Sergant B, Michael Daye, Officer C, Officer B, Investigator A, Sergant A, Lieutenant A, Sabin Kaplan, Elaine Velez, Captain A. and Steven Maher |
| 1:2021cv01715 |
| February 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42:1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE REFERRED TO Judge Ronnie Abrams as possibly related to 1:17-cv-7954. (gp) |
| Filing 4 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault..(jus) |
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY filed in 21-mc-199...(gp)
|
| Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 17-cv-7954 (RA). Document filed by Jane Smith..(gp) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(gp) |
| Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jane Smith, Anthony J. Annucci, Jason Effman, Steven Maher, Christian Nunez, John Shipley, Sabin Kaplan, Michael Daye, Elaine Velez, Captain A., Captain B, Lieutenant A, Sergant A, Sergant B, Officer A, Officer B, Officer C, Officer D, Unidentified Officer, Grievance Supervisor, Investigator A. (Filing Fee $ $402.00, Receipt Number 465401274544)Document filed by Jane Smith..(gp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
