Fajardo v. Green Tea Spa at 35, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Clara Fajardo
Defendant: Bryan Lee and Green Tea Spa at 35, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv01811
Filed: March 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Ronnie Abrams
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2021 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Green Tea Spa at 35, Inc., Bryan Lee..(jgo)
March 3, 2021 Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
March 3, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
March 3, 2021 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
March 3, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Ria Julien. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Bryan Lee. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (jgo)
March 3, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Ria Julien. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 15:2;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 29:201;. (jgo)
March 2, 2021 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Green Tea Spa at 35, Inc. and Bryan Lee, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Clara Fajardo..(Julien, Ria)
March 2, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Julien, Ria)
March 2, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Green Tea Spa at 35, Inc., Bryan Lee. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24156147)Document filed by Clara Fajardo..(Julien, Ria)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fajardo v. Green Tea Spa at 35, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bryan Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Green Tea Spa at 35, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clara Fajardo
Represented By: Ria Julien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?