Cerqueira v. City of New York et al
Plaintiff: MARIO R CERQUEIRA and Mario R. Cerqueira
Defendant: THE CITY OF NEW YORK, New York City Department of Parks & Recreation, New York City Department of Parks and Recreation and City of New York
Case Number: 1:2021cv02016
Filed: March 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lewis J Liman
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pi
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2021 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. New York City Department of Parks and Recreation served on 3/23/2021, answer due 4/13/2021. Service was accepted by Raed Ibrahim. Document filed by Mario R. Cerqueira..(Winograd, Richard)
April 5, 2021 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. City of New York served on 3/23/2021, answer due 4/13/2021. Service was accepted by Raed Ibrahim. Document filed by Mario R. Cerqueira..(Winograd, Richard)
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby: ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an Initial Pretrial Conference by TELEPHONE on May 25, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. Parties are directed to dial into the Court's teleconference number at 888-251-2909, Access Code 2123101, and follow the necessary prompts. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by one week prior to conference, the parties jointly submit to the Court a proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order. A template is available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-lewis-j-liman. This document should be filed electronically on ECF, consistent with the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, which are available on the same webpage. Parties should consult the Individual Practices for guidance on the matters to be discussed at the Initial Pretrial Conference and for the Court's rules with respect to communications with Chambers and other procedural matters. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 5/25/2021 at 02:00 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 4/02/2021) (ama)
March 11, 2021 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against City of New York, New York City Department of Parks and Recreation. Document filed by Mario R. Cerqueira..(Winograd, Richard)
March 10, 2021 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to City of New York, New York City Department of Parks and Recreation..(jgo)
March 10, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
March 10, 2021 Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
March 10, 2021 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lewis J. Liman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
March 10, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Richard Winograd to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the All Defendant radio button was selected; each party must be individually selected. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (jgo)
March 10, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Richard Winograd. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Jurisdiction code 3 (Federal Question); Dollar Demand $10,000,000,000; County code New York; Fee Status code due (due);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Jurisdiction code has been modified to 4 (Diversity); the Dollar Demand has been modified to none; the County code has been modified to XX Out of State; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid);. (jgo)
March 10, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Richard Winograd. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: MARIO R CERQUEIRA; THE CITY OF NEW YORK; New York City Department of Parks & Recreation. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party name was entered in all caps;. (jgo)
March 9, 2021 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to THE CITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by MARIO R CERQUEIRA..(Winograd, Richard)
March 9, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Winograd, Richard)
March 9, 2021 Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR - COMPLAINT against All Defendants. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24224214)Document filed by MARIO R CERQUEIRA..(Winograd, Richard) Modified on 3/10/2021 (jgo).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cerqueira v. City of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE CITY OF NEW YORK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Department of Parks & Recreation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Department of Parks and Recreation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARIO R CERQUEIRA
Represented By: Richard Winograd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mario R. Cerqueira
Represented By: Richard Winograd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?