Brown v. ConEd Security
Plaintiff: Nkosi S. Brown
Defendant: ConEd Security
Case Number: 1:2021cv02188
Filed: March 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Colleen McMahon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2021 Filing 6 LETTER from N. Brown, re: The Police do not know where to find Tori Hampton and Dwayne Nash, the two people who have been harassing me. My Police Report Number is 2016-041-7484. You can confirm my brain hacking with that number etc.. Document filed by Nkosi S. Brown.(sc)
March 16, 2021 Mailed a copy of #4 Order of Dismissal, #5 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), and Notice of Appeal Instructions to Nkosi S. Brown at 1171 Washington Ave., Apt. 2A, Bronx, NY 10456. (kh)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 3/15/21) (Attachments: #1 PRO SE APPEAL PACKAGE) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Plaintiff is warned that further frivolous litigation in this Court will result in an order barring her from filing new actions IFP without prior permission. See 28 U.S.C. 1651. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 3/15/21) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 3/15/2021) (vn) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
March 15, 2021 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(bcu)
March 12, 2021 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ConEd Security. Document filed by Nkosi S. Brown. (sac)
March 12, 2021 Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Nkosi S. Brown. (sac)
March 12, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. ConEd Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ConEd Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nkosi S. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?