Segal v. New York State Unified Court System et al
| David Segal |
| New York State Unified Court System, Appellate Division First Judicial Department, Janet DiFiore, Office of Court Administration and Chief Judge New York State Court of Appeals |
| 1:2021cv02545 |
| March 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed under the doctrines of Eleventh Amendment immunity, absolute judicial immunity, and the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state-law claims Plaintiff may be asserting. 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. Plaintiff has consented to receive electronic service of notice and documents in this action. (ECF 5.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/7/2021) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (sac)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff has consented to receive electronic service of notices and documents in this action. (ECF 5.) Plaintiff's amended complaint is dismissed under the doctrines of Eleventh Amendment immunity, absolute judicial immunity, and the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state-law claims Plaintiff may be asserting. 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/7/2021) (sac)
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(wb) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to NYS Unified Court System, Office of Court Administration, Appellate Div. First Jud. Dept., Janet Difiore, re: #2 Complaint. Document filed by David Segal. (sc) |
| Filing 7 FIRST AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, re: amending #2 Complaint against Appellate Division First Judicial Department, Chief Judge New York State Court of Appeals, Janet DiFiore, New York State Unified Court System, Office of Court Administration with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by David Segal. Related document: #2 Complaint.(sc) |
| Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: $402.00 Check processed by the Finance Department on 04/20/2021, Receipt Number 465401277942. (Williams, Brandon) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT(Affirmation) of David Segal withdrawing re: #1 Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Document filed by David Segal. (sc) |
| Filing 5 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: David Segal consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by David Segal.(sc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PRO SE by David Segal. (sc) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET..(rdz) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Appellate Division First Judicial Department, Chief Judge New York State Court of Appeals, Janet DiFiore, New York State Unified Court System, Office of Court Administration. Document filed by David Segal..(rdz) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by David Segal..(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
