Hedges v. Paul A. Schmitt Music Company
| Donna Hedges |
| Paul A. Schmitt Music Company |
| 1:2021cv03067 |
| April 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Ronnie Abrams |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and "so ordered" by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 6/4/2021) (kv)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement With Prejudice. Document filed by Donna Hedges..(LaBollita, Michael) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniella Adler on behalf of Paul A. Schmitt Music Company..(Adler, Daniella) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby: ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of service of the summons and complaint, the parties must meet and confer for at least one hour in a good-faith attempt to settle this action. To the extent the parties are unable to settle the case themselves, they must also discuss whether further settlement discussions through the districts court-annexed mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fifteen (15) additional days (i.e., within forty-five (45) days of service of the summons and complaint), the parties must submit a joint letter requesting that the Court either (1) refer the case to mediation or a magistrate judge (and indicate a preference between the two options), or (2) schedule an initial status conference in the matter. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 4/23/2021) (kv)
|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Paul A. Schmitt Music Company waiver sent on 4/14/2021, answer due 6/14/2021. Document filed by Donna Hedges..(LaBollita, Michael) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Paul A. Schmitt Music Company..(dnh) |
| Case Designated ECF. (dnh) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (dnh) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(dnh) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Michael A. LaBollita. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Fee Status code due (due). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid). (dnh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Michael Gottlieb on behalf of Donna Hedges..(Gottlieb, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(LaBollita, Michael) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Paul A. Schmitt Music Company, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Donna Hedges..(LaBollita, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Paul A. Schmitt Music Company. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24373163)Document filed by Donna Hedges..(LaBollita, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hedges v. Paul A. Schmitt Music Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Donna Hedges | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Michael Gottlieb |
| Represented By: | Michael A. LaBollita |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Paul A. Schmitt Music Company | |
| Represented By: | Daniella Adler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
