Molyneaux v. Otis Elevator Company et al
Plaintiff: Eusebia Molyneaux
Defendant: Schindler Elevator Corporation and Otis Elevator Company
Case Number: 1:2021cv03100
Filed: April 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: J Paul Oetken
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2021 Filing 20 RULE 26 DISCLOSURE.Document filed by Eusebia Molyneaux..(Vrionedes, Leandros)
May 20, 2021 Filing 19 NOTICE of Notice of Subpoena. Document filed by Eusebia Molyneaux..(Vrionedes, Leandros)
May 12, 2021 Filing 18 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Otis Worldwide Corporation for Otis Elevator Company, Otis Elevator Company, Otis Elevator Company. Document filed by Otis Elevator Company..(Drury, Christopher)
May 12, 2021 Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christopher R. Drury on behalf of Otis Elevator Company..(Drury, Christopher)
April 28, 2021 Filing 16 RULE 26 DISCLOSURE.Document filed by Eusebia Molyneaux..(Vrionedes, Leandros)
April 27, 2021 Filing 15 LETTER addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Catherine G. Bryan, Esq. dated April 27, 2021 re: basis for diversity of citizenship. Document filed by Schindler Elevator Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Consent for Removal).(Bryan, Catherine)
April 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: Schindler shall, on or before April 30, 2021, (1) show cause as to why Otis's consent is not required for the removal of this case or (2) have Otis notify the Court of its consent. See Berrios v. Our Lady of Mercy Med. Ctr., No. 99-cv-21, 1999 WL 92269, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 19, 1999) ("[C]onsent communicated among the defendants is insufficient; each defendant must notify the Court of its consent prior to the expiration of the thirty-day period for the removal petition to be timely."). If Schindler fails to do so, the Court will remand this case sua sponte. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 4/19/2021) (js)
April 15, 2021 Filing 13 RULE 26 DISCLOSURE.Document filed by Eusebia Molyneaux..(Vrionedes, Leandros)
April 12, 2021 Filing 12 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS.Document filed by Eusebia Molyneaux..(Vrionedes, Leandros)
April 12, 2021 Filing 11 FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES Document filed by Eusebia Molyneaux..(Vrionedes, Leandros)
April 12, 2021 Filing 10 REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS.Document filed by Eusebia Molyneaux..(Vrionedes, Leandros)
April 12, 2021 Filing 9 DEPOSITION.Document filed by Eusebia Molyneaux..(Vrionedes, Leandros)
April 12, 2021 Filing 8 DEMAND for Trial by Jury. Document filed by Eusebia Molyneaux.(Vrionedes, Leandros)
April 12, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Leandros A. Vrionedes on behalf of Eusebia Molyneaux..(Vrionedes, Leandros)
April 12, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint., CROSSCLAIM against Otis Elevator Company. Document filed by Schindler Elevator Corporation..(Bryan, Catherine)
April 12, 2021 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj)
April 12, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (sj)
April 12, 2021 Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj)
April 12, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Catherine G. Bryan to RE-FILE Document No. #4 Answer to Complaint, Crossclaim. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the pleading is not correct; Caption error (wrong defendant name), caption should have Crossclaim caption. Re-file the pleading using the event type Crossclaim found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (sj)
April 9, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Justin Michael Vogel on behalf of Schindler Elevator Corporation..(Vogel, Justin)
April 9, 2021 Filing 4 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING ANSWER to Complaint, CROSSCLAIM against Otis Elevator Company. Document filed by Schindler Elevator Corporation..(Bryan, Catherine) Modified on 4/12/2021 (sj).
April 9, 2021 Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Schindler Enterprises, Inc., Corporate Parent Schindler Holding, Ltd. for Schindler Elevator Corporation. Document filed by Schindler Elevator Corporation..(Bryan, Catherine)
April 9, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Bryan, Catherine)
April 9, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of Bronx. Case Number: 34771-2020E. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24377861).Document filed by Schindler Elevator Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Summons and Verified Complaint, #2 Exhibit B, Verified Answer of Otis Elevator Co., #3 Exhibit C, Notice of Electronic Filing, Supp. Summons and Verified Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit D, Verified Answer of Otis Elevator Co., #5 Exhibit E, Notice of Service and Service of Process for SEC, #6 Exhibit F, Answer of SEC, #7 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #8 Notice to Adverse Party of Filing of Notice of Removal).(Bryan, Catherine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Molyneaux v. Otis Elevator Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eusebia Molyneaux
Represented By: Leandros A. Vrionedes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schindler Elevator Corporation
Represented By: Catherine G. Bryan
Represented By: Justin Michael Vogel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Otis Elevator Company
Represented By: Christopher R. Drury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?