Korovin v. Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.
Plaintiff: Eugene Korovin
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv03294
Filed: April 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Andrew L Carter
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting #31 Motion to Dismiss; granting #24 Motion to Dismiss. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter is GRANTED, dismissing Plaintiff's state law claims. Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's federal law claim GRANTED. However, the dismissal of the federal and state claims is without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate ECF Nos. 24, 31. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 9/30/2022) (ate)
April 15, 2022 Filing 38 LETTER addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from E. Korovin, dated 4/16/22 re: I need more time to respond to this motion - until 5/27/22. I am struggling with an emergency situation related to my fiance's family and relatives in Ukraine - Kharkov, dedicating all of my free time to my relatives etc. Document filed by Eugene Korovin.(sc)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #36 Letter filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. ( Responses due by 4/18/2022, Replies due by 5/2/2022.) (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 3/29/2022) (vfr)
March 18, 2022 Filing 36 LETTER addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Samuel J. Rubin dated March 18, 2022 re: Plaintiffs March 17, 2022 letter. Document filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Rubin, Samuel)
March 17, 2022 Filing 35 LETTER addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from E. Korovin dated 3/17/21 re: I am requesting one more month to respond to CGMHI's Motion to Dismiss - till 4/17/22. I have an emergency situation related to my close relatives in Kharkiv, Ukraine. Due to aggression by Russian Federation, parents and relatives of my fiance have been affected by the war etc. Document filed by Eugene Korovin.(sc)
February 17, 2022 Filing 34 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of (1) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint; (2) the Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint; (3) Declaration of Samuel J. Rubin served on Eugene Korovin on February 17, 2022. Document filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Rubin, Samuel)
February 17, 2022 Filing 33 DECLARATION of Samuel J. Rubin in Support re: #31 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6).. Document filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Part 1, #2 Exhibit A - Part 2, #3 Exhibit A - Part 3, #4 Exhibit A - Part 4, #5 Exhibit A - Part 5, #6 Exhibit A - Part 6, #7 Exhibit B).(Rubin, Samuel)
February 17, 2022 Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #31 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6). . Document filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Rubin, Samuel)
February 17, 2022 Filing 31 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6). Document filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Rubin, Samuel)
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #29 Letter filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 2/17/2022., Responses due by 3/17/2022, Replies due by 3/31/2022.) (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 1/27/2022) (ate)
January 27, 2022 Filing 29 LETTER addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Samuel J. Rubin dated January 27, 2022 re: Joint Request for Briefing Schedule. Document filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Rubin, Samuel)
December 28, 2021 Filing 28 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #27 Letter, filed by Eugene Korovin. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff's requested extension is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to file his response on or before January 28, 2022. ( Responses due by 1/28/2022) (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 12/28/2021) (ate)
December 22, 2021 Filing 27 LETTER addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from E. Korovin, dated 12/22/21 re: I need more time to respond to CGMHI's Motion to Dismiss. I am helping members of my family who are sick with Covid. Please give me time till the end of January to respond to the Motion to Dismiss. Document filed by Eugene Korovin.(sc)
December 3, 2021 Filing 26 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss served on Eugene Korovin on December 3, 2021. Document filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Rubin, Samuel)
December 3, 2021 Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #24 MOTION to Dismiss . . Document filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Rubin, Samuel)
December 3, 2021 Filing 24 MOTION to Dismiss . Document filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Rubin, Samuel)
November 17, 2021 Filing 23 LETTER addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Samuel J. Rubin dated November 17, 2021 Document filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Rubin, Samuel)
October 7, 2021 Filing 22 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. waiver sent on 10/4/2021, answer due 12/3/2021. Document filed by Eugene Korovin. (sc)
October 7, 2021 Filing 21 NOTICE OF A LAWSUIT & REQUEST TO WAIVE SERVICE OF A SUMMONS. Document filed by Eugene Korovin. (sc)
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 INFORMATION PACKAGE MAILED to Eugene Korovin 2872 Gaynor Ave. Richmond, CA 94804, at, on 8/11/2021 Re: #18 Order of Service. The following document(s) were enclosed in the Service Package: a copy of the order of service or order to answer and other orders entered to date, the individual practices of the district judge and magistrate judge assigned to your case, Instructions for Litigants Who Do Not Have Attorneys, Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, a flyer about the free legal assistance clinic located in the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse (only in non prisoner cases), a Motions guide, a notice that the Pro Se Manual has been discontinued, a Notice of Change of Address form to use if your contact information changes, a handout explaining matters handled by magistrate judges and consent form to complete if all parties agree to proceed for all purposes before the magistrate judge, a form for you to complete if you consent to receive filings electronically (only in nonprisoner cases), one or more summonses (only if you have paid the fee in person or if the judge has ordered that a summons be issued to you) - 1 copies of Summons(es) mailed. (aan)
August 11, 2021 Filing 19 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (aan)
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER OF SERVICE: Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, paid the filing fees to commence this action. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue a summons as to Defendant Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. Plaintiff is directed to serve the summons and complaint on Defendant within 90 days of the issuance of the summons. If within those 90 days, Plaintiff has not either served Defendant or requested an extension of time to do so, the Court may dismiss the claims against Defendant under Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to serve and/or prosecute. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 8/11/2021) (kv) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.
August 6, 2021 Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: $402.00 Check processed by the Finance Department on 08/06/2021, Receipt Number 465401283923. (bwi)
July 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is denied as Plaintiff has sufficient assets to pay the fee. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Plaintiff is directed to pay the $402.00 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this Order. On July 22, 2021, Plaintiff moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 16. Plaintiff's application is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to pay the $402.00 filing fee by no later than August 6, 2021. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. No further extensions will be granted absent good cause shown. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. Filing Fee due by 8/6/2021. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 7/23/2021) (nb) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Modified on 7/23/2021 (nb).
July 22, 2021 Filing 16 APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. Document filed by Eugene Korovin.(sc)
July 22, 2021 Filing 15 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Eugene Korovin consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Eugene Korovin.(sc)
July 2, 2021 Mailed a copy of #14 Order Directing Payment of Fee or IFP Application to Eugene Korovin at 2872 Gaynor Ave., Richmond, CA 94804. (kh)
July 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION: Accordingly, Plaintiffs request for an extension through July 22, 2021 to pay the required fee is GRANTED. By that date, Plaintiff must pay the $402.00 in fees. Alternatively, if Plaintiff cannot pay the required fee, Plaintiff can submit the attached IFP application. If Plaintiff submits the IFP application, it should be labeled with docket number 21-cv-3294. If the Court grants the IFP application, Plaintiff will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. No further extensions shall be granted absent good cause shown. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Filing Fee due by 7/22/2021. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 7/22/2021. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 7/1/2021) (Attachments: #1 attachment) (kv) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
June 30, 2021 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.'s Letter regarding Plaintiff's request for an additional extension of time to pay filing fees served on Eugene Korovin on June 30, 2021. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Rubin, Samuel)
June 30, 2021 Filing 12 LETTER addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from Samuel J. Rubin dated June 30, 2021 re: Plaintiff's request for an additional extension of time to pay filing fees. Document filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Rubin, Samuel)
June 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #10 Letter re: I need more time to mail the court filing fee for my complaint against Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. etc. I just returned back to the U.S. from Russia and a m currently making arrangements to collect the necessary amount to pay the court fee. Please give me 3-4 extra weeks to send the filing fee($402.00). I should be able to mail the filing fee by 7/22/21., filed by Eugene Korovin. ENDORSEMENT: Defendant is hereby ORDERED to respond to Plaintiff's request by no later than June 30, 2021. Defendant is directed to serve Plaintiff with their response and file proof of service by no later than June 30, 2021. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of this order.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 6/25/2021) (rj) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
June 25, 2021 Mailed a copy of #11 Memo Endorsement, to Eugene Korovin at 2872 Gaynor Ave., Richmond, CA 94804. (dsh)
June 23, 2021 Filing 10 LETTER addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from E. Korovin, dated 6/23/21 re: I need more time to mail the court filing fee for my complaint against Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. etc. I just returned back to the U.S. from Russia and am currently making arrangements to collect the necessary amount to pay the court fee. Please give me 3-4 extra weeks to send the filing fee($402.00). I should be able to mail the filing fee by 7/22/21. Document filed by Eugene Korovin.(sc)
June 3, 2021 Filing 9 LETTER addressed to Judge Valerie E. Caproni from Samuel J. Rubin dated June 3, 2021 re: notice of related case. Document filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Rubin, Samuel)
May 12, 2021 Filing 8 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Citigroup Inc. for Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.. Document filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Rubin, Samuel)
May 12, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Notice to Attorney Samuel Joseph Rubin to RE-FILE Document #6 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. ERROR(S): Corporate Parents/Other affiliates were not added. Please re-file this document and when prompted: Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?, select the YES radio button and enter the Corporate Parent(s) or Affiliate(s). (ldi)
May 10, 2021 Mailed a copy of #7 Memo Endorsement, to Eugene Korovin at 2872 Gaynor Ave., Richmond, CA 94804. (dsh)
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMO ENDORSEMENT re: #2 Letter, filed by Eugene Korovin. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff's request for an extension to pay the required court filing fee is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have until June 30, 2021 to make the payment. Plaintiff is advised that the case will not proceed until the fee is paid. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 5/7/2021) (nb) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
May 6, 2021 Filing 6 FILING ERROR - CORPORATE PARENT/OTHER AFFILIATE NOT ADDED - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Rubin, Samuel) Modified on 5/12/2021 (ldi).
May 6, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Elizabeth M. Zito on behalf of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Zito, Elizabeth)
May 6, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Samuel Joseph Rubin on behalf of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Rubin, Samuel)
May 6, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Marshall Howard Fishman on behalf of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc...(Fishman, Marshall)
May 6, 2021 Filing 2 LETTER addressed to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. from E. Korovin, dated 5/5/21 re: I request postponement or waiver for the Court fee. I have filed a complaint by email as I am currently in Russia because of a health emergency of my parents etc. I am planning to return to California on 6/21/21. Please allow me to mail the money order when I get back or waive the fee based on those circumstances. Document filed by Eugene Korovin.(sc)
April 16, 2021 CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:20-cv-07619-ALC. Notice of Assignment to follow. (wb)
April 16, 2021 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(wb)
April 16, 2021 Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (wb)
April 14, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.. Document filed by Eugene Korovin..(rdz)
April 14, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (rdz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Korovin v. Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.
Represented By: Marshall Howard Fishman
Represented By: Elizabeth M. Zito
Represented By: Samuel Joseph Rubin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eugene Korovin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?