Mills v. Avon Products, Inc.
| Anthony Richard Roy Mills |
| Avon Products, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv03625 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 nr |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE REMANDED OUT from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the State Court - Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. Sent certified copy of docket entries and remand order. Mailed via UPS Tracking Number 1ZE22E533710053540 on 4/28/2021..(kv) |
Filing 9
CONSENT ORDER TO REMAND TO STATE COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that removal under 28 U.S.C. 1446(b)(2)(a) was not effectuated, and this matter is hereby remanded back to State Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 4/27/2021) (kv) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Filing 8 PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER. Document filed by Anthony Richard Roy Mills..(Woodard, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Daniel J. Woodard dated April 26, 2021 re: Consent Order to Remand. Document filed by Anthony Richard Roy Mills..(Woodard, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Daniel J. Woodard dated April 26, 2021 re: Consent Order to Remand. Document filed by Anthony Richard Roy Mills. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER TO REMAND TO STATE COURT).(Woodard, Daniel) Modified on 4/26/2021 (dt). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel John Woodard on behalf of Anthony Richard Roy Mills..(Woodard, Daniel) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Notice to Attorney Daniel Woodard to RE-FILE Document #6 Letter. ERROR(S): Documents have to be filed separately. (dt) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Whitney Daye Seltzer. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Anthony Richard Roy Mills. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Whitney Daye Seltzer. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 09:203; Nature of Suit code 245 (Tort Product Liability); Jury Demand code b (Both); Dollar Demand $75,000; County code New York; Fee Status code due (due);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 28:1332; the Nature of Suit code has been modified to 365 (Personal Inj. Prod. Liability); the Jury Demand code has been modified to d (Defendant); the Dollar Demand has been modified to none; the County code has been modified to Rockland; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid);. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Avon Products, Inc...(Seltzer, Whitney) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Natura & Co for Avon Products, Inc.. Document filed by Avon Products, Inc...(Seltzer, Whitney) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Seltzer, Whitney) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 190089/2021. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24444147).Document filed by Avon Products, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's NYS S&C).(Seltzer, Whitney) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mills v. Avon Products, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Avon Products, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Whitney Daye Seltzer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anthony Richard Roy Mills | |
| Represented By: | Daniel John Woodard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
