Williams v. Clott et al
| Tearre M. Williams |
| ADA Christopher Mills and Judge Clott |
| 1:2021cv04207 |
| May 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: #7 Order of Dismissal in favor of Clott, Christopher Mills against Tearre M. Williams. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated May 19, 2021, the Court dismisses this action. Specifically, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983 as frivolous and under the doctrines of judicial and prosecutorial immunity, as well as under the doctrine of Younger abstention. The Court also dismisses Plaintiff's claims for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241 without prejudice. Because the complaint makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253. The Court further certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Judgment is hereby entered. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 5/19/2021) (Attachments: #1 Right to Appeal) (km) |
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: For the reasons set forth above, the Court dismisses this action. Specifically, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983 as frivolous and under the doctrines of judicial and prosecutorial immunity, as well as under the doctrine of Younger abstention. The Court also dismisses Plaintiff's claims for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241 without prejudice. Because the complaint makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253. The Court further certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Plaintiff has consented to electronic service of court documents. (See Dkt. #3).SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 5/19/2021) (rro) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
| Mailed a copy of #8 Clerk's Judgment and Appeals forms to Tearre Williams at 600 West141st Street New York, NY 10031.(km) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Christopher Mills. (sac) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Judge Clott. (sac) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Tearre M. Williams consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Tearre M. Williams. (sac) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Tearre M. Williams. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Clott, Christopher Mills. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number 465401279211) Document filed by Tearre M. Williams. (sac) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
| Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: Credit Card processed by the Finance Department on 5/11/2021, Receipt Number 465401279211. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
