Lim v. Radish Media, Inc. et al
| Jun Young Lim |
| Seung Yoon Lee and Radish Media, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv04379 |
| May 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
STIPULATION ACCEPTING SERVICE AND EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT: NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Defendants acknowledge that their counsel accepted service of the summons and complaint on May 26, 2001; 2. The parties agree that the time for defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended from June 16, 2021 to August 20, 2021; 3. The parties agree that defendants will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court's jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but they waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. IT IS SO ORDERED., Seung Yoon Lee answer due 8/20/2021; Radish Media, Inc. answer due 8/20/2021. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 6/15/2021) (ama)
|
|
Filing 7
PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Seung Yoon Lee, Radish Media, Inc...(Battaglia, Leni)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Leni Dylan Battaglia on behalf of Seung Yoon Lee, Radish Media, Inc...(Battaglia, Leni)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jade Yee on behalf of Seung Yoon Lee, Radish Media, Inc...(Yee, Jade)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Radish Media, Inc...(jgo)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney John F. Olsen. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Nature of Suit code 150 (Contract: Recovery/Enforcement); Citizenship Defendant code 4 (Incorporated/Principal Place of Business-This State); Dollar Demand $2,200,000;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Nature of Suit code has been modified to 190 (Contract: Other); the Citizenship Defendant code has been modified to 1 (Citizen of This State); the Dollar Demand has been modified to none;. (jgo)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Radish Media, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Jun Young Lim..(Olsen, John)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Olsen, John)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Seung Yoon Lee, Radish Media, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24544039)Document filed by Jun Young Lim..(Olsen, John)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
