The Phoenix Insurance Company v. Hudson Excess Insurance Company
| The Phoenix Insurance Company |
| Hudson Excess Insurance Company |
| 1:2021cv04474 |
| May 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| John P Cronan |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 jd |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR RESPOND: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned parties that the time for Defendant Hudson Excess Insurance Company to answer, appear and/or otherwise move against the Complaint is hereby extended up to and including August 6, 2021. Hudson agrees not to assert any affirmative defense relating to personal jurisdiction or service of process, nor to move to dismiss on such a basis., Hudson Excess Insurance Company answer due 8/6/2021., Motions terminated: #9 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint by stipulation (to August 6, 2021) addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Michael F. Panayotou dated 07/06/2021. filed by Hudson Excess Insurance Company. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 7/7/2021) (nb)
|
|
Filing 9
FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint by stipulation (to August 6, 2021) addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Michael F. Panayotou dated 07/06/2021. Document filed by Hudson Excess Insurance Company..(Panayotou, Michael)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Frank Panayotou on behalf of Hudson Excess Insurance Company..(Panayotou, Michael)
|
|
Filing 7
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Odyssey Reinsurance Company, Corporate Parent Hudson Specialty Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Odyssey Group Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Hudson Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited for Hudson Excess Insurance Company. Document filed by Hudson Excess Insurance Company..(Panayotou, Michael)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Hudson Excess Insurance Company served on 6/2/2021, answer due 6/23/2021. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by The Phoenix Insurance Company..(Reid, Meg)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: This case has been assigned to the undersigned for all purposes. All counsel must familiarize themselves with the Court's Individual Rules, which are available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-john-p-cronan. Counsel for all parties are hereby ORDERED to appear before the undersigned for an Initial Pretrial Conference ("IPTC") in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on August 3, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will conduct the IPTC by teleconference. At the scheduled time, counsel for all parties should call (866) 434-5269, access code 9176261, and as further set forth in this Order. So ordered. (Initial Conference set for 8/3/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge John P. Cronan.) (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 5/20/2021) (rjm)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Hudson Excess Insurance Company..(jgo)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John P. Cronan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Hudson Excess Insurance Company, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by The Phoenix Insurance Company..(Reid, Meg)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Reid, Meg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Hudson Excess Insurance Company. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24556566)Document filed by The Phoenix Insurance Company..(Reid, Meg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Phoenix Insurance Company v. Hudson Excess Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hudson Excess Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Michael Frank Panayotou |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Phoenix Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Meg R. Reid |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
