Decatur Licensing LLC v. Sony Corporation Of America
Decatur Licensing LLC |
Sony Corporation Of America |
1:2021cv04691 |
May 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Gregory H Woods |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting #12 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint, or Otherwise Respond to Complaint., #1 Complaint. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to August 24, 2021. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 12. SO ORDERED. (Sony Corporation Of America answer due 8/24/2021.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 6/23/2021) (rro) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint, or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. Document filed by Decatur Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order).(Curfman, Andrew) |
Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint,. Sony Corporation Of America served on 6/4/2021, answer due 6/25/2021. Service was accepted by Kathy Krieger-Jewell, Authorized Agent. Document filed by Decatur Licensing LLC..(Loaknauth, Nicholas) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Andrew S Curfman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Gregory H. Woods)(Text Only Order) (wv) |
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #9 MOTION for Andrew S Curfman to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-24659244. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Andrew S Curfman to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-24659244. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Decatur Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support with Exhibit A-Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order).(Curfman, Andrew) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 8/16/2021 at 04:00 PM before Judge Gregory H. Woods. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 5/26/2021) (ate) |
Filing 7 AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(pc) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Sony Corporation Of America..(pc) |
Case Eligible for Patent Pilot Program. (pc) |
Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Sony Corporation of America, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Decatur Licensing LLC..(Loaknauth, Nicholas) |
Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Decatur Licensing LLC..(Loaknauth, Nicholas) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Loaknauth, Nicholas) |
Filing 2 AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Loaknauth, Nicholas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sony Corporation Of America. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24588897)Document filed by Decatur Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: US Pat. No. 9,706,467, #2 Exhibit B: Claim Chart).(Loaknauth, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Decatur Licensing LLC v. Sony Corporation Of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sony Corporation Of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Decatur Licensing LLC | |
Represented By: | Nicholas Netram Loaknauth |
Represented By: | Andrew S. Curfman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.