Sanchez v. Tradestation Group, Inc.
| Cristian Sanchez |
| Tradestation Group, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv04723 |
| May 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Ronnie Abrams |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that the above-entitled action against all Defendants shall be and hereby is dismissed pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) without prejudice; without costs, or disbursements, or attorneys' fees to any party. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 7/27/2021) (jca)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Tradestation Group, Inc.. Document filed by Cristian Sanchez. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #7 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Ryan P. Poscablo dated July 7, 2021. ORDERED that the time within which Defendant must file an answer or responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint be, and the same hereby is, EXTENDED to August 6, 2021, or such later date as this Court establishes by subsequent order. (As further set forth in this Order.) Tradestation Group, Inc. answer due 8/6/2021. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 7/8/2021) (cf)
|
| Filing 7 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Ryan P. Poscablo dated July 7, 2021. Document filed by Tradestation Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order).(Poscablo, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Tradestation Group, Inc. served on 6/16/2021, answer due 7/7/2021. Service was accepted by Tammy Rose, Service of Process Intake Clerk. Document filed by Cristian Sanchez..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER. It is hereby: ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of service of the summons and complaint, the parties must meet and confer for at least one hour in a good-faith attempt to settle this action. To the extent the parties are unable to settle the case themselves, they must also discuss whether further settlement discussions through the districts court-annexed mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fifteen (15) additional days (i.e., within forty-five (45) days of service of the summons and complaint), the parties must submit a joint letter requesting that the Court either (1) refer the case to mediation or a magistrate judge (and indicate a preference between the two options), or (2) schedule an initial status conference in the matter. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 6/2/21) (yv)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Tradestation Group, Inc. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Tradestation Group, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Cristian Sanchez..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tradestation Group, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24593792)Document filed by Cristian Sanchez..(Mizrahi, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sanchez v. Tradestation Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tradestation Group, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Paul Poscablo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cristian Sanchez | |
| Represented By: | Joseph H Mizrahi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
