Lawson v. Mitchell & Titus LLP et al
Tiffany Lawson |
Irene Davis, Mitchell & Titus LLP and Frederick E. Davis Jr. |
1:2021cv04894 |
June 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Mary Kay Vyskocil |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER terminating #29 Letter Motion for Extension of Time (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil)(Text Only Order) |
Filing 33 ORDER granting #32 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Granted. SO ORDERED. No further extensions. Motions due by 3/21/2022. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 3/3/2022) (tg) |
Filing 32 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to restore action addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Amit Kumar dated March 2, 2022. Document filed by Tiffany Lawson..(Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 31 ORDER denying without prejudice #30 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. This request is DENIED without prejudice. The Court gives parties time to finalize a settlement agreement and to restore an action in the event that no settlement occurs. It does not retain jurisdiction while parties fulfill any obligations under their agreement. If by "finally execute the settlement agreement," the parties mean sign the agreement, they may renew this request for an extension of time to move to reopen the case. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 3/2/2022) (tg) |
Filing 30 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to restore action noting Defendants' consent addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Amit Kumar dated March 1, 2022. Document filed by Tiffany Lawson..(Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 29 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to restore action addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Amit Kumar dated February 28, 2022. Document filed by Tiffany Lawson..(Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 28 ORDER granting #27 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Motions due by 2/28/2022. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 1/25/2022) (tg) |
Filing 27 SECOND LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to restore action made on consent addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Amit Kumar dated January 25, 2022. Document filed by Tiffany Lawson..(Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 26 ORDER granting #25 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Granted. SO ORDERED. Motions due by 1/28/2022. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 1/3/2022) (tg) |
Filing 25 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to restore action addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. Document filed by Tiffany Lawson..(Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 24 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court is in receipt of a letter from the parties informing the Court that they have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 23]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the application to restore the action is made by December 29, 2021. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir.2004). All other dates and deadlines are adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 12/29/2021.) (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 11/29/2021) (tg) |
Filing 23 STATUS REPORT. and request to adjourn all deadlines, sine die Document filed by Tiffany Lawson..(Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 22 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #20 Status Report filed by Tiffany Lawson. ENDORSEMENT: Granted. SO ORDERED. Status letter due 11/19/2021. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 11/18/2021) (va) |
Filing 20 STATUS REPORT. Pursuant to Court Order Document filed by Tiffany Lawson..(Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 19 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #18 Status Report filed by Tiffany Lawson. ENDORSEMENT: Granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 10/22/2021) (vfr) |
FIRST MEDIATION CONFERENCE. Mediation Conference scheduled for 10/22/2021 at 10:00 AM in telephone or video conference. (sb) |
MEDIATION CONFERENCE NOT HELD Mediation Conference scheduled for 10/22/2021 was not held. Mediation Status due by 11/8/2021. (sb) |
Filing 18 STATUS REPORT. Pursuant to Court Order Document filed by Tiffany Lawson..(Kumar, Amit) |
MEDIATION CONFERENCE NOT HELD Mediation Conference scheduled for 10/18/2021 was not held. (sb) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting #16 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. SO ORDERED. The October 21 IPTC is adjourned. Counsel must provide a status letter regarding the mediation by October 21, 2021. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 10/8/21) (yv) |
Filing 16 JOINT LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Amit Kumar dated September 23, 2021. Document filed by Tiffany Lawson..(Kumar, Amit) |
FIRST MEDIATION CONFERENCE. Mediation Conference scheduled for 10/18/2021 at 11:00 AM in telephone or video conference. (sb) |
NOTICE OF MEDIATOR ASSIGNMENT - Notice of assignment of mediator. Mediator Schedule due by 9/20/2021.(ah) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 10/21/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. The conference will be held telephonically. To join the conference, dial 888-278-0296 and enter access code 5195844. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 8/18/2021) (tg) |
Filing 14 ORDER OF AUTOMATIC REFERRAL TO MEDIATION (See M-10-468 Second Amended Standing Order). Please reference the Pilot Discovery Protocols, attached, and the Mediation Program Procedures (https://nysd.uscourts.gov/programs/mediation-adr). E-mail MediationOffice@nysd.uscourts.gov, telephone 212-805-0643. Mediator to be Assigned by 8/26/2021. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/1/15) (jpt) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Irene Davis, Frederick E. Davis Jr., Mitchell & Titus LLP..(Collins, Nicholas) |
Filing 12 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Mitchell & Titus LLP..(Collins, Nicholas) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nicholas Lydell Collins on behalf of Irene Davis, Frederick E. Davis Jr., Mitchell & Titus LLP..(Collins, Nicholas) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Darrell Spencer Gay on behalf of Irene Davis, Frederick E. Davis Jr., Mitchell & Titus LLP..(Gay, Darrell) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between counsel for the parties hereto that the time of Defendants Mitchell & Titus, LLP, Frederick E. Davis, Jr., and Irene Davis to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint is adjourned through and including August 16, 2021, and in support states as follows: 1. Defendants accepted service of the Summons and Complaint on June 22, 2021, and thus have agreed to waive any defenses as to service of the Summons and Complaint. Defendants have not agreed to waive any other defenses in this case. 2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (a)(1)(A), Defendants response to the Complaint would be due on or about July 13, 2021. 3. This is the first request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint. 4. All parties have consented to the requested extension. A facsimile shall be treated as an original for purposes of this Stipulation. SO ORDERED., Irene Davis answer due 8/16/2021; Frederick E. Davis Jr. answer due 8/16/2021; Mitchell & Titus LLP answer due 8/16/2021. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 7/14/2021) (rj) |
Filing 8 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Irene Davis, Frederick E. Davis Jr., Mitchell & Titus LLP..(Gay, Darrell) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Irene Davis served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. Service was accepted by Mr. Richie - Authorized Person. Document filed by Tiffany Lawson..(Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Frederick E. Davis Jr. served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. Service was accepted by Mr. Richie - Authorized Person. Document filed by Tiffany Lawson..(Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Mitchell & Titus LLP served on 6/7/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky - Authorized Agent. Document filed by Tiffany Lawson..(Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Irene Davis, Frederick E. Davis Jr., Mitchell & Titus LLP..(pc) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Mitchell & Titus LLP, Frederick E. Davis, Jr., and Irene Davis, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Tiffany Lawson..(Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kumar, Amit) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Irene Davis, Frederick E. Davis Jr., Mitchell & Titus LLP. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24621919)Document filed by Tiffany Lawson..(Kumar, Amit) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.