Goldfarb v. Burt's Bees, Inc.
| David Goldfarb and Moshe Goldfarb |
| Burt's Bees, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv04904 |
| June 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Victor Marrero |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 fr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Burt's Bees, Inc.. Document filed by Moshe Goldfarb. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Schlachet, Mark) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #10 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply / Letter Motion for Extension of Deadline to File Responsive Pleading addressed to Judge Victor Marrero from Michael W. Ross dated July 30, 2021. Request GRANTED. The defendant's response to the complaint is hereby due no later than August 23, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 8/2/2021) (ate)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Burt's Bees, Inc. answer due 8/23/2021. (ate) |
| Filing 10 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply / Letter Motion for Extension of Deadline to File Responsive Pleading addressed to Judge Victor Marrero from Michael W. Ross dated July 30, 2021. Document filed by Burt's Bees, Inc...(Ross, Michael) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael W. Ross on behalf of Burt's Bees, Inc...(Ross, Michael) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Request Granted. The defendant's response to the Complaint is hereby due no later than August 2, 2021. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 7/1/2021) (js)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Burt's Bees, Inc. answer due 8/2/2021. (js) |
| Filing 7 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading addressed to Judge Victor Marrero from Elizabeth A. Edmondson dated June 30, 2021. Document filed by Burt's Bees, Inc...(Edmondson, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Burt's Bees, Inc. served on 6/11/2021, answer due 7/2/2021. Service was accepted by Lindsay Brunson. Document filed by Moshe Goldfarb..(Schlachet, Mark) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Burt's Bees, Inc...(gp) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Burt's Bees, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Moshe Goldfarb..(Schlachet, Mark) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Mark Schlachet to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the issuance of summons is not correct; PDF should consist of summons request only (Remove attached Complaint). Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (sj) |
| Filing 3 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Burt's Bees, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Moshe Goldfarb. (Attachments: #1 Complaint).(Schlachet, Mark) Modified on 6/9/2021 (sj). |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Mark Schlachet. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: David Goldfarb. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party text was omitted;. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Mark Schlachet. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Citizenship Defendant code 2 (Citizen of Another State); Jury Demand code n (None);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Citizenship Defendant code has been modified to 5 (Incorporated/Principal Place of Business-Other State); the Jury Demand code has been modified to p (Plaintiff);. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Victor Marrero. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Schlachet, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Burt's Bees, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24624250)Document filed by David Goldfarb..(Schlachet, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
