Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation v. Bohrer, PLLC et al
Plaintiff: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
Defendant: Bohrer, PLLC, Jeremy I. Bohrer, PLLC and Jeremy I. Bohrer
Case Number: 1:2021cv05340
Filed: June 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Ronnie Abrams
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting #16 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 7/29/2021) (vfr)
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 LETTER REPLY to Response to Motion addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Claude M. Millman dated July 29, 2021 re: #16 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint or Motion addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Claude M. Millman dated July 28, 2021. . Document filed by Jeremy I. Bohrer, Bohrer, PLLC..(Millman, Claude)
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Jeremy I. Bohrer answer due 8/20/2021; Bohrer, PLLC answer due 8/20/2021. (vfr)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Luke Nikas dated July 28, 2021 re: #16 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint or Motion addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Claude M. Millman dated July 28, 2021. . Document filed by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1).(Nikas, Luke)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Caroline Rule on behalf of Jeremy I. Bohrer, Bohrer, PLLC..(Rule, Caroline)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint or Motion addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Claude M. Millman dated July 28, 2021. Document filed by Jeremy I. Bohrer, Bohrer, PLLC..(Millman, Claude)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Claude M Millman on behalf of Jeremy I. Bohrer, Bohrer, PLLC..(Millman, Claude)
July 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Ben O'Neil to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Ronnie Abrams)(Text Only Order) (arc)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #12 MOTION for Ben O'Neil to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (vba)
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Court's Order and Notice of Initial Conference served on Bohrer PLLC and Jeremy I. Bohrer on June 29, 2021. Document filed by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation..(Feher, Nora)
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION for Ben O'Neil to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Attorney Declaration, #2 Certificate of Good Standing in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, #3 Certificate of Good Standing in the Court of Appeals of Maryland, #4 Text of Proposed Order).(O'Neil, Benjamin)
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #11 MOTION for Benjamin Almond O'Neil to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-24725453. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Notarized Affidavit or Declaration;. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order. (vba)
June 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Benjamin Almond O'Neil to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-24725453. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit D.C. Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit Maryland Certificate of Good Standing).(O'Neil, Benjamin) Modified on 6/29/2021 (vba).
June 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER AND NOTICE OF INITIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 9/24/2021 at 02:15 PM before Judge Ronnie Abrams. The Court will hold this conference by telephone. The parties shall use the dial-in information provided below to call into the conference: Call-in Number: (888) 363-4749; Access Code: 1015508. This conference line is open to the public. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 6/25/2021) (cf)
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Civil Cover Sheet, Summons and Complaint with Exhibits A-H served on Bohrer PLLC and Jeremy I. Bohrer on June 18, 2021. Document filed by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation..(Feher, Nora)
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nora Feher on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation..(Feher, Nora)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jeremy I. Bohrer..(jgo)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Bohrer, PLLC..(jgo)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney William Anthony Burck. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $20,000,000,000;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to $9,999,000;. (jgo)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Luke William Nikas on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation..(Nikas, Luke)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Jeremy I. Bohrer, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation..(Burck, William)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Bohrer, PLLC (f/k/a Jeremy I. Bohrer, PLLC), re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation..(Burck, William)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Burck, William)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jeremy I. Bohrer, Bohrer, PLLC. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24684227)Document filed by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H).(Burck, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation v. Bohrer, PLLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bohrer, PLLC
Represented By: Claude M Millman
Represented By: Caroline Rule
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeremy I. Bohrer, PLLC
Represented By: Claude M Millman
Represented By: Caroline Rule
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeremy I. Bohrer
Represented By: Claude M Millman
Represented By: Caroline Rule
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
Represented By: Luke William Nikas
Represented By: William Anthony Burck
Represented By: Benjamin Almond O'Neil
Represented By: Nora Feher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?