A.C. et al v. New York City Department of Education
| A. C., P. D. and A.C. |
| New York City Department of Education |
| 1:2021cv05600 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Paul A Engelmayer |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1415 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Angelique Antoinette Pesce on behalf of New York City Department of Education..(Pesce, Angelique) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer from Angelique Pesce dated August 3, 2021. Granted. SO ORDERED. New York City Department of Education answer due 10/5/2021. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 8/4/2021) (va)
|
| Filing 6 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer from Angelique Pesce dated August 3, 2021. Document filed by New York City Department of Education..(Krebs, Howard) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. New York City Department of Education served on 7/15/2021, answer due 8/5/2021. Service was accepted by Betty Mazyck, Clerk. Document filed by A. C.; P. D.(on behalf of their disabled daughter T.C.); P. D.(individually ); A.C...(Mayerson, Gary) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to New York City Department of Education. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Gary S Mayerson. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand Blank; County code Albany. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to 29,000; the County code has been modified to Richmond. (vf) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to New York City Department of Education, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by A. C.(Individually), A.C (on behalf of their disabled daughter T.C.), P. D.(on behalf of their disabled daughter T.C.), P. D.(individually )..(Mayerson, Gary) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Mayerson, Gary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against New York City Department of Education. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24727372)Document filed by A. C.(Individually), A.C (on behalf of their disabled daughter T.C.) P. D.(on behalf of their disabled daughter T.C.), P. D.(individually ).(Mayerson, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
