CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd et al v. Air India, Ltd.
Plaintiff: Telcom Devas Mauritius Limited, CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd and Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited
Defendant: Air India and Air India, Ltd.
Case Number: 1:2021cv05601
Filed: June 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Paul G Gardephe
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 STIPULATION AND ORDER: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned attorneys for the parties: 1. The time for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendant's Pre-Motion Letter is extended from August 26, 2021, to September 2, 2021. 2. Nothing in this Stipulation and Proposed Order sh all prejudice Plaintiffs' ability to seek, on consent or by motion, a further extension to respond to the Pre-Motion Letter. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 8/25/2021) (jca)
August 24, 2021 Filing 18 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, Telcom Devas Mauritius Limited..(Champion, Anne)
August 23, 2021 Filing 17 LETTER MOTION for Conference addressed to Judge Paul G. Gardephe from Richard J. Holwell dated August 23, 2021. Document filed by Air India, Ltd...(Holwell, Richard)
August 23, 2021 Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Prishika Raj on behalf of Air India, Ltd...(Raj, Prishika)
August 23, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Zachary Adam Kerner on behalf of Air India, Ltd...(Kerner, Zachary)
August 23, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Dorit Ungar Black on behalf of Air India, Ltd...(Black, Dorit)
August 23, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Richard J Holwell on behalf of Air India, Ltd...(Holwell, Richard)
July 20, 2021 Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint,,. Air India, Ltd. served on 7/1/2021, answer due 8/30/2021. Service was accepted by Sunil Daware, authorized agent. Document filed by CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd; Telcom Devas Mauritius Limited; Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited..(McGill, Matthew)
July 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: The conference currently scheduled for September 2, 2021 is adjourned to October 28, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. The conference will take place by telephone. The parties are directed to dial 888-363-4749 to participate, and to enter the access code 6212642. Initial Conference set for 10/28/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Paul G. Gardephe. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 7/16/2021) (nb)
July 15, 2021 Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Notice of Pretrial Conference (Dkt. No. 8) and Individual Rules of Practice of Judge Paul G. Gardephe served on Defendant on July 13, 2021. Service was accepted by Sunil Daware, authorized agent. Document filed by CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, Telcom Devas Mauritius Limited..(McGill, Matthew)
July 7, 2021 Filing 9 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY (SEE DOCUMENT #12) - AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint,,. Air India, Ltd. served on 7/1/2021, answer due 7/22/2021. Service was accepted by Sunil Daware, Authorized Agent. Document filed by CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd; Telcom Devas Mauritius Limited; Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited..(McGill, Matthew) Modified on 7/22/2021 (ldi).
July 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear before the Court for an initial pretrial conference in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on September 2, 2021 at 11:45 a.m. in Courtroom 705 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) MUST: (i) IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ALL ATTORNEYS IN THIS ACTION BY SERVING UPON EACH OF THEM COPIES OF THIS NOTICE AND THE COURT'S INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES; AND (ii) SEND A COPY OF SUCH NOTICE TO CHAMBERS (without attachments). IF COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) IS UNAWARE OF THE IDENTITY OF COUNSEL FOR ANY OF THE PARTIES, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) MUST IMMEDIATELY SEND COPIES OF THE NOTICE AND INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES TO THAT PARTY PERSONALLY. Principal trial counsel must appear at this and all subsequent conferences. So Ordered. ( Initial Conference set for 9/2/2021 at 11:45 AM in Courtroom 705, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Paul G. Gardephe.) (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 7/6/21) (yv)
July 2, 2021 Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (wb)
July 2, 2021 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(wb)
July 2, 2021 CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:21-cv-04375-PGG. Notice of Assignment to follow. (wb)
June 29, 2021 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Air India, Ltd. (vf)
June 29, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Matthew D. McGill. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code New York. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of U.S. (vf)
June 29, 2021 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. (vf)
June 29, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Matthew D. McGill. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Air India. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name entered incorrectly. (vf)
June 29, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (vf)
June 29, 2021 CASE REFERRED TO Judge Paul G. Gardephe as possibly related to 1:21-cv-04375. (vf)
June 28, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anne Marie Champion on behalf of CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, Telcom Devas Mauritius Limited..(Champion, Anne)
June 28, 2021 Filing 5 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, Telcom Devas Mauritius Limited..(McGill, Matthew)
June 28, 2021 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Air India, Ltd, re: #1 Complaint,,. Document filed by CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, Telcom Devas Mauritius Limited..(McGill, Matthew)
June 28, 2021 Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 1:21-cv-04375. Document filed by CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, Telcom Devas Mauritius Limited..(McGill, Matthew)
June 28, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(McGill, Matthew)
June 28, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Air India, Ltd. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24727366)Document filed by CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd, Telcom Devas Mauritius Limited, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Award on Jurisdiction and Merits, #2 Exhibit 2 - Treaties, #3 Exhibit 3 - Award on Quantum, #4 Exhibit 4 - Judgment, #5 Exhibit 5, Part 1 - Award, #6 Exhibit 5, Part 2 - Award, #7 Exhibit 6 - Procedural Order, #8 Exhibit 7 - Correspondence).(McGill, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd et al v. Air India, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Telcom Devas Mauritius Limited
Represented By: Matthew D. McGill
Represented By: Anne Marie Champion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd
Represented By: Matthew D. McGill
Represented By: Anne Marie Champion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited
Represented By: Matthew D. McGill
Represented By: Anne Marie Champion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Air India
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Air India, Ltd.
Represented By: Richard J Holwell
Represented By: Dorit Ungar Black
Represented By: Prishika Raj
Represented By: Zachary Adam Kerner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?