Lawtone-Bowles v. The City of New York (NYC) et al
Nicole Lawtone-Bowles |
The City of New York Transportation (DOT), The City of New York Police Department Traffic Agents (TEA), The City of New York (NYC), The City of New York office of the Corporation Counsel (LAW), The City of New York Department of Health (DOHMH) and The City of New York Department of Finance (DOF) |
1:2021cv05620 |
June 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Laura Taylor Swain |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against The City of New York (NYC), The City of New York Department of Finance (DOF), The City of New York Department of Health (DOHMH), The City of New York Police Department Traffic Agents (TEA), The City of New York Transportation (DOT), The City of New York office of the Corporation Counsel (LAW), re: amending #2 Complaint, with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Nicole Lawtone-Bowles. Related document: #2 Complaint.(sc) |
Filing 6 ORDER TO AMEND: Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint that complies with the standards set forth above. Plaintiff must submit the amended complaint to this Court's Pro Se Intake Unit within sixty days of the date of this order, caption the document as an "Amended Complaint," and label the document with docket number 21-CV-5620 (LTS). An Amended Complaint form is attached to this order. No summons will issue at this time. If Plaintiff fails to comply within the time allowed, and she cannot show good cause to excuse such failure, the complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/12/21) (rdz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 6/30/2021) (vn) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(wb) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Permission for Nicole L. Lawtone-Bowles to participate in electronic case filing in this case. Document filed by Nicole Lawtone-Bowles..(rdz) |
Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Nicole L. Lawtone-Bowles consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Nicole Lawtone-Bowles..(rdz) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against The City of New York (NYC), The City of New York Department of Finance (DOF), The City of New York Department of Health (DOHMH), The City of New York Police Department Traffic Agents (TEA), The City of New York Transportation (DOT), The City of New York office of the Corporation Counsel (LAW). Document filed by Nicole Lawtone-Bowles..(rdz) |
Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Nicole Lawtone-Bowles..(rdz) |
Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.