Mitnick v. CBRE, Inc. et al
| Assignee Steven Mitnick and Steven Mitnick |
| JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., CBRE, Inc. and Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv05753 |
| July 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
STIPULATION AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between plaintiff STEVEN MITNICK, as Assignee for the Benefit of Creditors of NW Sign Industries, Inc. ("Plaintiff"), by his attorneys, Middlebrooks Shapiro, P.C., and defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ("JPM"), by its attorneys, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, as follows: JPM's time to move, answer, or othetwise respond to the Complaint dated July 2, 2021 (ECF No. 1, the "Complaint") is hereby extended through and including September 14, 2021. JPM waives any and all defenses concerning service of the Summons dated July 7,202 L (ECF No. 11, the "Summons") and Complaint. SO ORDERED. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. answer due 9/14/2021. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 7/29/2021) (rro)
|
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kenneth A. Philbin on behalf of JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A...(Philbin, Kenneth) |
| Filing 18 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent JPMorgan Chase & Co. for JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Document filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A...(Handler, Matthew) |
| Filing 17 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A...(Handler, Matthew) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Matthew Handler on behalf of JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A...(Handler, Matthew) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #14 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or a Motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 on or before September 15, 2021 addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Jenny R. Chou dated July 28, 2021. Application GRANTED. SO ORDERED. CBRE, Inc. answer due 9/15/2021 (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 7/28/2021) (jca)
|
| Filing 14 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or a Motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 on or before September 15, 2021 addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Jenny R. Chou dated July 28, 2021. Document filed by CBRE, Inc...(Chou, Jenny) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jenny R. Chou on behalf of CBRE, Inc...(Chou, Jenny) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 9/15/2021. (jca) |
|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 10/20/2021 at 03:00 PM before Judge Katherine Polk Failla. The conference will be held telephonically. At the scheduled date and time, the parties are to call (888) 363-4749 and enter access code 5123533. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 7/14/2021) (vfr)
|
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A...(sj) |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc...(sj) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to CBRE, Inc...(sj) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., re: #4 Complaint. Document filed by Steven Mitnick..(Shapiro, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC., re: #4 Complaint. Document filed by Steven Mitnick..(Shapiro, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to CBRE, INC., re: #4 Complaint. Document filed by Steven Mitnick..(Shapiro, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Shapiro, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against CBRE, Inc., JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc.. Document filed by Steven Mitnick..(Shapiro, Joseph) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Joseph M. Shapiro. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Joseph M. Shapiro to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the All Defendant radio button was selected;. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Joseph M. Shapiro. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Assignee Steven Mitnick. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Joseph M. Shapiro to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Request for Issuance of Summons,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Each summons must be filed separately. Or you can use one summons form and list each party on a separate rider.;. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Joseph M. Shapiro. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $1,017,926,000; County code New York;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to blank; the County code has been modified to XX Out of State;. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| Filing 3 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to CBRE, INC., JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC., and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Steven Mitnick. (Attachments: #1 Summons to JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., #2 Summons to CBRE, INC.).(Shapiro, Joseph) Modified on 7/6/2021 (pc). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph M. Shapiro on behalf of Steven Mitnick..(Shapiro, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR -COMPLAINT against All Defendants. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24752956)Document filed by Steven Mitnick..(Shapiro, Joseph) Modified on 7/6/2021 (pc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
