G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Perez et al
| G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC |
| Juan Perez doing business as 40/40 Club, Krystian Santini doing business as 40/40 Club, Twenty Ones Incorporated doing business as 40/40 Club, Juan Perez Individually doing business as 40/40 Club, Krystian Santini Individually doing business as 40/40 Club and Twenty Ones Incorporated an unknown business entity doing business as 40/40 Club |
| 1:2021cv06210 |
| July 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 47 U.S.C. § 605 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Paul Brian Maslo on behalf of Juan Perez, Krystian Santini, Twenty Ones Incorporated..(Maslo, Paul)
|
|
Filing 18
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Juan Perez, Krystian Santini, Twenty Ones Incorporated..(Spiro, Alexander)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #16 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint ., #1 Complaint. Application GRANTED. Defendants may answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before September 22, 2021. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket entry 16. SO ORDERED.Juan Perez answer due 9/22/2021; Krystian Santini answer due 9/22/2021; Twenty Ones Incorporated answer due 9/22/2021. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 8/24/2021) (tg)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint . Document filed by Juan Perez, Krystian Santini, Twenty Ones Incorporated..(Carberry, John)
|
|
Filing 15
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Juan Perez, Krystian Santini, Twenty Ones Incorporated..(Carberry, John)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by William Nicholas Wright on behalf of Juan Perez, Krystian Santini, Twenty Ones Incorporated..(Wright, William)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Francis Carberry on behalf of Juan Perez, Krystian Santini, Twenty Ones Incorporated..(Carberry, John)
|
|
Filing 12
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Juan Perez served on 8/6/2021, answer due 8/27/2021. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC..(Loughlin, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: The conference will be held telephonically. At the scheduled date and time, the parties are to call (888) 363-4749 and enter access code 5123533. (And as further set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 11/10/2021 at 04:00 PM before Judge Katherine Polk Failla. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 8/17/2021) (jca)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Twenty Ones Incorporated served on 7/29/2021, answer due 8/19/2021. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky, Business Document Specialist, NYS Sec. of State. Document filed by G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC..(Loughlin, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Krystian Santini served on 7/31/2021, answer due 8/23/2021. Service was accepted by Jessica Jackson, Co-Occupant. Document filed by G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC..(Loughlin, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Twenty Ones Incorporated. (vf)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Krystian Santini. (vf)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Juan Perez. (vf)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Joseph P. Loughlin. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Juan Perez, Krystian Santini, Twenty Ones Incorporated. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (vf)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (vf)
|
|
Filing 5
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Twenty Ones Incorporated., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC..(Loughlin, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 4
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Krystian Santini, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC..(Loughlin, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Juan Perez, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC..(Loughlin, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Loughlin, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Juan Perez, Krystian Santini, Twenty Ones Incorporated. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24821869)Document filed by G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC..(Loughlin, Joseph)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
