Sanchez v. 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC et al
Plaintiff: Raphy Sanchez
Defendant: 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC and Chestnut Holdings of New York, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv06305
Filed: July 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE AGAINST OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT, Defendants 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC and Chestnut Holdings of New York, Inc. ("Defendants"), by and through their counsel, Gimigliano Mauriello & Maloney, P.A., stipulate with plaintiff Raphy Sanchez, by and through his counsel, Abdul Hassan Law Group, PLLC, that the time within which Defendants may serve their Answer, move against or otherwise respond to the Complaint be and the same is hereby extended through and including September 30, 2021. No provision of this Stipulation and Order shall be construed as a waiver of, and Defendants expressly reserve, any and all defenses except as to insufficient service of process and lack of personal jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC answer due 9/30/2021; Chestnut Holdings of New York, Inc. answer due 9/30/2021. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/19/2021) (kv)
August 18, 2021 Filing 9 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC, Chestnut Holdings of New York, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Stipulation and Order).(Druck, Joshua)
August 5, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC served on 7/29/2021, answer due 8/19/2021; Chestnut Holdings of New York, Inc. served on 7/29/2021, answer due 8/19/2021. Service was accepted by NY Secretary of State. Document filed by Raphy Sanchez..(Hassan, Abdul)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by November 23, 2021, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO IMMEDIATELY SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER AND THE COURT'S INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES TO ALL PARTIES. (And as further set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 7/28/2021) (jca)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendants shall, by November 23, 2021, e-mail a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/node/754 and attached to this order, to Orders_and_Judgments@nysd.uscourts.gov. If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge rather than before me. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this order. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so ordered. If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by November 23, 2021, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 7/28/21) (yv)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 7/28/2021) (vfr)
July 27, 2021 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC, Chestnut Holdings of New York, Inc. (vf)
July 27, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (vf)
July 27, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Abdul Karim Hassan. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 29:216(b) FLSA: Minimum wage or overtime compensation (vf)
July 27, 2021 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf)
July 27, 2021 Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf)
July 26, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Hassan, Abdul)
July 26, 2021 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC and, Chestnut Holdings of New York, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Raphy Sanchez..(Hassan, Abdul)
July 26, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC, Chestnut Holdings of New York, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24838185)Document filed by Raphy Sanchez..(Hassan, Abdul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanchez v. 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raphy Sanchez
Represented By: Abdul Karim Hassan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 2050 Valentine Avenue LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chestnut Holdings of New York, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?