Begum v. Garland et al
Plaintiff: Taslima Begum
Defendant: Merrick Garland and Antony Blinken
Case Number: 1:2021cv06546
Filed: August 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Colleen McMahon
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Letter Motion for Extension of Time; granting #5 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Adjournment granted. Conference adjourned sine die. If this action becomes moot before 12/1/2021, please advise.. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 10/1/2021) (kv)
October 1, 2021 Set/Reset Deadlines: Antony Blinken answer due 11/19/2021; Merrick Garland answer due 11/19/2021. (kv)
September 30, 2021 Filing 5 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time for the government to respond to the complaint (from October 5 to November 19, 2021) addressed to Judge Colleen McMahon from AUSA Michael J. Byars dated September 30, 2021., CONSENT LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference presently scheduled for October 28, 2021 addressed to Judge Colleen McMahon from AUSA Michael J. Byars dated September 30, 2021. Document filed by Antony Blinken, Merrick Garland..(Byars, Michael)
September 14, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael James Byars on behalf of Antony Blinken, Merrick Garland..(Byars, Michael)
August 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER SCHEDULING AN INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: If a conforming case management plan is submitted at least two business days prior to the scheduled initial conference and subsequently approved by the Court, the initial conference will be canceled automatically. If a motion has been filed either before or after the case management plan is approved, and the parties desire a conference, a letter must be submitted to the Court via fax specifically asking that the initial conference not be canceled. If the parties fail to agree upon such a plan or fail to submit the plan to the Court within the time provided (at least two business days before the conference date), the parties must participate in a telephone conference on 10/28/2021 at 11:30 a.m. Parties should dial in at 1(888)363-4749, access code (9054506) to join the conference. Initial Conference set for 10/28/2021 at 11:30 AM before Judge Colleen McMahon. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 8/20/2021) (tg)
August 5, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Lavy, Yaniv)
August 4, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (vf)
August 4, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Yaniv Lavy. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Antony J. Blinken, Merrick Garland, Taslima Begum. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly; party text was omitted; party name entered incorrectly. (vf)
August 4, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING REMOVAL OF PARTY. Notice to attorney Yaniv Lavy. The following party/parties has been removed from this case: Audrey Strauss. The party was added to the case in error. (vf)
August 4, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Yaniv Lavy. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (vf)
August 4, 2021 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Colleen McMahon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf)
August 4, 2021 Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf)
August 3, 2021 Filing 1 FIRST COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Antony Blinken, Merrick Garland.(Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24879355).Document filed by Taslima Begum. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Supporting Document).(Lavy, Yaniv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Begum v. Garland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Taslima Begum
Represented By: Yaniv Lavy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick Garland
Represented By: Michael James Byars
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antony Blinken
Represented By: Michael James Byars
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?