Boyd v. CAMBA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Rasheedah Boyd
Defendant: CAMBA, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv06616
Filed: August 5, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: J Paul Oetken
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2617
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2021 Filing 7 SERVICE ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the respective parties, that: (1) Jeffrey M. Schlossberg, as attorney for Defendant CAMBA, Inc., hereby acknowledges and accepts service of the Summons and Complaint on behalf of Defendant effective August 10, 2021. Acceptance of service is without prejudice to any and all defenses, with the exception of arguments that Defendant has not been served and have been improperly served; and (2) Defendants time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to October 8, 2021. CAMBA, Inc. answer due 10/8/2021. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 8/16/2021) (tg) Modified on 8/18/2021 (tg).
August 16, 2021 Filing 6 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Rasheedah Boyd..(Pappas, Michael)
August 16, 2021 Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Summons and Complaint served. CAMBA, Inc. served on 8/10/2021, answer due 8/31/2021. Service was accepted by M. Schlossberg. Document filed by Rasheedah Boyd..(Pappas, Michael)
August 6, 2021 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to CAMBA, Inc.. (vf)
August 6, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (vf)
August 6, 2021 Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf)
August 6, 2021 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf)
August 5, 2021 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to CAMBA, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rasheedah Boyd..(Pappas, Michael)
August 5, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Pappas, Michael)
August 5, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CAMBA, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24891228)Document filed by Rasheedah Boyd..(Pappas, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyd v. CAMBA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rasheedah Boyd
Represented By: Michael Peter Pappas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CAMBA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?