Boyd v. CAMBA, Inc.
Rasheedah Boyd |
CAMBA, Inc. |
1:2021cv06616 |
August 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
J Paul Oetken |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2617 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SERVICE ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the respective parties, that: (1) Jeffrey M. Schlossberg, as attorney for Defendant CAMBA, Inc., hereby acknowledges and accepts service of the Summons and Complaint on behalf of Defendant effective August 10, 2021. Acceptance of service is without prejudice to any and all defenses, with the exception of arguments that Defendant has not been served and have been improperly served; and (2) Defendants time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to October 8, 2021. CAMBA, Inc. answer due 10/8/2021. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 8/16/2021) (tg) Modified on 8/18/2021 (tg). |
Filing 6 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Rasheedah Boyd..(Pappas, Michael) |
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Summons and Complaint served. CAMBA, Inc. served on 8/10/2021, answer due 8/31/2021. Service was accepted by M. Schlossberg. Document filed by Rasheedah Boyd..(Pappas, Michael) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to CAMBA, Inc.. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to CAMBA, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rasheedah Boyd..(Pappas, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Pappas, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CAMBA, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24891228)Document filed by Rasheedah Boyd..(Pappas, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Boyd v. CAMBA, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rasheedah Boyd | |
Represented By: | Michael Peter Pappas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CAMBA, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.