Li v. Houghton et al
| Yun Bin Li |
| NY District Director Timothy Houghton, US Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary of DHS Alejandro Mayorkas, National Benefits Center, Timothy Houghton, Merrick Garland and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 1:2021cv06813 |
| August 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Naturalization Application |
| 05 U.S.C. § 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Alejandro Mayorkas. (vf) |
| Filing 10 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Alejandro Mayorkas, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Yun Bin Li..(De Luca, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to National Benefits Center. (vf) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Merrick Garland. (vf) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Timothy Houghton. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Stephen De Luca to RE-FILE Document No. #4 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): defendant party name error; defendant party name must correspond to pleading caption. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(De Luca, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to NATIONAL BENEFITS CENTER, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Yun Bin Li..(De Luca, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT - SUMMONS REQUEST - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Alejandro Mayorkas, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Yun Bin Li..(De Luca, Stephen) Modified on 8/16/2021 (vf). |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Merrick Garland, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Yun Bin Li..(De Luca, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Timothy Houghton, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus,. Document filed by Yun Bin Li..(De Luca, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland, Timothy Houghton, National Benefits Center (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24928042).Document filed by Yun Bin Li. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits).(De Luca, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
