McNalley v. J. Alexander's Holdings, Inc. et al
Clifton McNalley |
J. Alexander's Holdings, Inc., Lonnie J. Stout, II, Douglas K. Ammerman, Carl J. Grassi, Timothy T. Janszen, Ronald B. Maggard, Sr., Frank R. Martire and Raymond R. Quirk |
1:2021cv06961 |
August 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Jesse M Furman |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff Clifton McNalley ("Plaintiff") voluntarily dismisses the claims in the captioned action (the "Action") without prejudice. Because this notice of dismissal is being filed with the Court before service by defendants of either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff's dismissal of the Action is effective upon the filing of this notice. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/12/2021) (vfr) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Douglas K. Ammerman, Carl J. Grassi, J. Alexander's Holdings, Inc., Timothy T. Janszen, Ronald B. Maggard, Sr, Frank R. Martire, Raymond R. Quirk, Lonnie J. Stout, II. Document filed by Clifton McNalley. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Rowley, Shane) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on November 9, 2021, at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 1105 of the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, New York. Initial Conference set for 11/9/2021 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 1105, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Jesse M. Furman. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 8/19/2021) (ate) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jesse M. Furman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rowley, Shane) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Douglas K. Ammerman, Carl J. Grassi, J. Alexander's Holdings, Inc., Timothy T. Janszen, Ronald B. Maggard, Sr, Frank R. Martire, Raymond R. Quirk, Lonnie J. Stout, II. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24951804)Document filed by Clifton McNalley..(Rowley, Shane) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.