Kaul et al v. Intercontinental Exchange et al
| M.D. Richard Arjun Kaul, MD David Basch, Jane Doe and John Doe |
| Intercontinental Exchange, GEICO, TD Bank, Allstate Insurance Company, Federation State Medical Boards, Arthur Henrerer, Christopher J. Cristie, Daniel Stolz, Atlantic Health System, Robert Heary, Philip Murphy, Gurbir Grewal, Rivkin Radler Law Firm, Max Gersenoff and Arthur Hengerer |
| 1:2021cv06992 |
| August 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| J Paul Oetken |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 50
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Amended Complaint, served. Federation State Medical Boards, served on 10/5/2021, answer due 10/26/2021. Service was accepted by Joyce Woodward. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul. (sc)
|
|
Filing 49
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Amended Complaint, served. Rivkin Radler Law Firm served on 10/1/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. Service was accepted by Grethel Rubio at Rivkin Radler Law Firm. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul. (sc)
|
|
Filing 48
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Amended Complaint, served. Intercontinental Exchange, served on 10/11/2021, answer due 11/4/2021. Service was accepted by Daniel Mollin. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul. (sc)
|
|
Filing 47
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Amended Complaint, served. Atlantic Health System served on 10/5/2021, answer due 10/26/2021. Service was accepted by Mary Gallagher. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul. (sc)
|
|
Filing 46
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Amended Complaint, served. Robert Heary, served on 10/11/2021, answer due 11/1/2021. Service was accepted by Montclair Spine Center(person's name not given). Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul. (sc)
|
|
Filing 45
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Amended Complaint, served. Max Gersenoff, served on 10/1/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. Service was accepted by Grethel Rubio at Rivkin Radler Law Firm. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul. (sc)
|
|
Filing 44
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Amended Complaint, served. Daniel Stolz, served on 10/11/2021, answer due 11/1/2021. Service was accepted by Daniel Stolz. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul. (sc)
|
|
Filing 43
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Amended Complaint, served. GEICO served on 10/5/2021, answer due 11/11/2021. Service was accepted by unnamed person at Geico Ins. Company, 5260 Western Ave., Chevy Chase, MD 20815. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul. (sc) Modified on 10/13/2021 (sc).
|
|
Mailed a copy of #42 Order, Set Deadlines to Richard Arjun Kaul at 440 c Somerset Drive, Pearl River, NJ 10965. (kh)
|
|
Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #42 Order,,, Set Deadlines,,, to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (js)
|
|
Filing 42
ORDER: Defendant Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.'s request at Docket Number 39 for an extension of time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the amended complaint is granted. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the amended complaint on or before November 4, 2021. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to the pro se plaintiffs in this matter. So Ordered. Intercontinental Exchange answer due 11/4/2021. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 10/6/2021) (js)
|
|
Filing 41
LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #40 Order on Motion for Entry of Default,,,, Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Respectfully request that the Court clarify its prior Order to confirm that Defendant Rivkins time to respond to the Amended Complaint is extended through and including November 11, 2021 addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Joshua D. Smith, Esq. dated October 6, 2021. Document filed by GEICO, Max Gersenoff, Rivkin Radler Law Firm. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service of Letter Motion).(Smith, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 40
ORDER: Pro se plaintiffs' requests for default at Docket Numbers 21, 23, and 27 are denied without prejudice because plaintiffs have not complied with the Clerk of Courts requirements for such requests or filed any proof of service for the amended complaint. The letter motions for extension of time to file answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint at Docket Numbers 33 and 34 are granted. TD Bank shall respond to the amended complaint on or before November 1, 2021. GEICO Insurance Company and Max Gershenoff, Esq. shall respond to the amended complaint on or before November 11, 2021. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this order to the pro se plaintiffs in this matter. So Ordered. TD Bank answer due 11/1/2021; GEICO answer due 11/11/2021;. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 10/6/2021) (js) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Modified on 10/8/2021 (js).
|
|
Mailed a copy of #40 Order on Motion for Entry of Default, Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer to Richard Arjun Kaul at 440 c Somerset Drive, Pearl River, NJ 10965; and to David Basch at 90 S Sparta Ave., Sparta, NJ 07871. (kh)
|
|
Filing 39
LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to answer, move or otherwise plead, addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Stuart I. Friedman dated October 5, 2021. Document filed by Intercontinental Exchange..(Friedman, Stuart)
|
|
Filing 38
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Stuart I. Friedman on behalf of Intercontinental Exchange..(Friedman, Stuart)
|
|
Filing 37
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Rivkin Radler Law Firm, served on 10/1/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. Service was accepted by Grethel Rubio at Rivkin Radler Law Firm. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul. (sc) Modified on 10/5/2021 (sc).
|
|
Filing 36
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint, served. Max Gersenoff, served on 10/1/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. Service was accepted by Grethel Rubio at Rivkin Radler Law Firm. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul. (sc)
|
|
Filing 35
LETTER addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from R. Kaul, M.D. dated 10/4/21 re: "DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR EXTENSION TO ANSWER RE: DEFENDANTS RIVKIN RADLER/MAX GERSENOFF" - There exists no basis in law or equity to support of justify the defendants' "bad faith" request whose sole purpose is to continue their violation of my human rights. I urge the Court to deny any request made by the defendants. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul.(sc)
|
|
Filing 34
LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #14 Amended Complaint,, addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Barry I. Levy, Esq. dated October 4, 2021. Document filed by GEICO, Max Gersenoff, Rivkin Radler Law Firm. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service of Letter Motion and Notices of Appearance).(Levy, Barry)
|
|
Filing 33
LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise respond to amended complaint to and including November 1, 2021 addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from William T. Marshall, Jr. dated October 4, 2021. Document filed by TD Bank. (Attachments: #1 Email trail).(Marshall, William)
|
|
Filing 32
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Brian Laurence Bank on behalf of GEICO, Max Gersenoff, Rivkin Radler Law Firm..(Bank, Brian)
|
|
Filing 31
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joshua Douglas Smith on behalf of GEICO, Max Gersenoff, Rivkin Radler Law Firm..(Smith, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 30
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Barry I. Levy on behalf of GEICO, Max Gersenoff, Rivkin Radler Law Firm..(Levy, Barry)
|
|
Filing 29
FILING ERROR - WRONG PDF FILE ASSOCIATED WITH DOCKET ENTRY - PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT(Entry of Default). Document filed by David Basch, Richard Arjun Kaul. (sc) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Modified on 10/1/2021 (dt).
|
|
Filing 28
AFFIDAVIT(Affirmation) of Daniel Stolz IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT, re: #27 MOTION for Entry of Default as to Daniel Stolz. Document filed by David Basch, Richard Arjun Kaul. (sc)
|
|
Filing 27
REQUEST(Motion) FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT, re: for Entry of Default as to Daniel Stolz. Document filed by David Basch, Richard Arjun Kaul.(sc)
|
|
Filing 26
FILING ERROR - WRONG PDF FILE ASSOCIATED WITH DOCKET ENTRY - PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT(Entry of Default). Document filed by David Basch, Richard Arjun Kaul. (sc) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Modified on 10/1/2021 (dt).
|
|
Filing 25
LETTER addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from R. Kaul, M.D., D. Basch, M.D. dated 9/29/21 re: Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 201, please find submitted the following documents and within facts that further establish the Southern District of New York as the proper venue, and the District of New Jersey as an improper venue: Investigative report in Wall Street Journal regarding corruption in the federal judiciary: "131 Federal Judges Broke the Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had a Financial Interest" - 9/28/21(Exhibit 1); Admissions of fact regarding bribery by Defendants of Defendant/U.S.D.J. Martinotti-8/1/19(Exhibit 2) etc. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul.(sc)
|
|
Filing 24
AFFIDAVIT(Affirmation) of Richard A. Kaul, MD IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT, re: #23 MOTION for Entry of Default as to Robert Heary. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul. (sc)
|
|
Filing 23
REQUEST(Motion) FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT, re: for Entry of Default as to Robert Heary. Document filed by R.A. Kaul, MD.(sc) Modified on 10/1/2021 (sc). Modified on 10/1/2021 (sc).
|
|
Mailed a copy of Docket sheet to Richard Arjun Kaul at 440 c Somerset Drive Pearl River, NJ 10965 862 881 9702..(wb)
|
|
Mailed a copy of the Docket sheet to David Basch at 90 S Sparta Ave. Sparta, NJ 07871 201 396 0346..(wb)
|
|
***NOTICE to Richard Arjun Kaul and David Basch to RE-FILE DOCUMENT - PDF ERROR. Notice to Richard Arjun Kaul and David Basch to RE-FILE Document #29 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default. You have to use the Clerk's certificate of Default Form on the Court's Website, but in this case you would have to prepare your own because there was an Amended Complaint filed in the case.You would use the same format as in the clerk's Certificate, then after you have all of the information about the Complaint being filed and served and proof of service being filed, then you would add: then an amended complaint having been filed been filed on (date) and having been served on (Name) etc, etc. same format as to the complaint. you also have to file an Affidavit in Support, which has to be notarized, also before these document are filed the affidavits of service as to the Complaint and Amended Complaint have to be filed on the docket separately as there own entries. (dt)
|
|
***NOTICE TO Richard Arjun Kaul and David Basch to RE-FILE DOCUMENT - PDF ERROR. Notice to Richard Arjun Kaul and David Basch to RE-FILE Document #26 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default. You have to use the Clerk's certificate of Default Form on the Court's Website, but in this case you would have to prepare your own because there was an Amended Complaint filed in the case.You would use the same format as in the clerk's Certificate, then after you have all of the information about the Complaint being filed and served and proof of service being filed, then you would add: then an amended complaint having been filed been filed on (date) and having been served on (Name) etc, etc. same format as to the complaint. you also have to file an Affidavit in Support, which has to be notarized, also before these document are filed the affidavits of service as to the Complaint and Amended Complaint have to be filed on the docket separately as there own entries. (dt)
|
|
Filing 21
REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT. Document filed by David Basch, Richard Arjun Kaul.(ks) Modified on 10/1/2021 (sc).
|
|
Filing 20
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT: Document filed by David Basch..(rro)
|
|
Filing 22
LETTER addressed to Clerk of the Court from Richard Arjun Kaul dated 9/16/2021 re: I write this letter in furtherance of the above petition and do re-request that the within sought relief is granted. The Respondents have failed to oppose the petition, but yet continue to seek to traffic the claims of Kll-7 into the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, and the U.S.C.A. for the Third Circuit.. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul..(kv)
|
|
Filing 19
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Corporate Parent TD Bank US Holding Company, Corporate Parent TD Group US Holdings LLC for TD Bank. Document filed by TD Bank..(Marshall, William)
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by William Thomas Marshall, Jr on behalf of TD Bank..(Marshall, William)
|
|
Filing 17
LETTER addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Richard Kaul, dated 9/15/21 re: RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RULE 16 CONFERENCE. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul.(sc)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER: Plaintiffs' motion for a Rule 16 conference is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to the pro se plaintiffs in thismatter. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/15/2021) (js) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Mailed a copy of #16 Order to Richard Arjun Kaul at 440 c Somerset Drive, Pearl River, NJ 10965; and to David Basch at 90 S Sparta Ave., Sparta, NJ 07871. (kh)
|
|
Filing 15
LETTER addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from David J. D'Aloia dated 9/14/21 re: Response to Plaintiff's Request for Rule 16 Conference (D.I. 12). Document filed by Allstate Insurance Company..(D'Aloia, David)
|
|
Filing 14
AMENDED COMPLAINT, SUBMITTED PURS. TO RULE 15(a)(1)(A), re: amending #1 Complaint, against Allstate Insurance Company, Atlantic Health System, Christopher J. Cristie, Federation State Medical Boards, GEICO, Max Gersenoff, Gurbir Grewal, Robert Heary, Arthur Hengerer, Intercontinental Exchange, Jane Doe, John Doe, Philip Murphy, Rivkin Radler Law Firm, Daniel Stolz, TD Bank.Document filed by David Basch, Richard Arjun Kaul, Jane Doe, John Doe. Related document: #1 Complaint.(sc) Modified on 9/13/2021 (sc).
|
|
Filing 13
LETTER from R. Kaul, M.D. dated 8/30/21 re: "RULE 201 JUDICIAL NOTICE" - Purs. to Rule 201, I request the Court take judicial notice of the fact that state actors and agencies are deprived of immunity defenses, when their misconduct violates a person's Constitutional rights as held by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit etc. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul.(sc)
|
|
Filing 12
LETTER addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from R. Kaul, M.D. dated 9/10/21 re: "MOTION FOR RULE 16 CONFERENCE" - We respectfully submit that Defendants Allstate/Geico are at a minimum exploring the option of settlement and are doing so with a confidentiality clause in mind. A Rule 16 Conference would permit a confidential exploration of resolution on the claims against Allstate. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul.(sc)
|
|
Filing 11
WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Allstate Insurance Company waiver sent on 8/23/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. Document filed by Allstate Insurance Company..(D'Aloia, David)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Geri Albin on behalf of Allstate Insurance Company..(Albin, Geri)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David Joseph D'Aloia on behalf of Allstate Insurance Company..(D'Aloia, David)
|
|
Filing 8
LETTER addressed to Clerk of the Court from Richard Arjun Kaul, MD and David Basch MD dated 9/1/2021. Document filed by David Basch, Richard Arjun Kaul. On February 22. 2016, I commenced litigation in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, with the filing of Kaul v Christie: 16-CV-02364 (Kl of The KaulCases). The claims included antitrust charges against, amongst others, Kll-7 Defendant Atlantic Health System and The Kaul Cases Defendant, Hackensack University Medical Center ("HUMC") (relevant excerpt included). Kl was dismissed, but the claims were re-asserted in K2/KS/K11-2, but were once again dismissed, the last dismissal being occurring on July 30, 2021. On March 23. 2016, I sent a letter to the FTC, alerting them to the antitrust violations of The Kaul Cases Defendant, HUMC (copy enclosed).On December 4 2020, the FTC filed an administrative complaint against Defendant HUMC, in which it alleged that a proposed merger between Defendant HUMC and Englewood Hospital, was violative of antitrust law. It also filed a complaint for a restraining order and preliminary injunction (20-CV-18140). The order was granted on August 4, 2021 (excerpt included).On August 31, 2021, Defendant HUMC was quoted in an online blog, in regard to its defeat in the United States District Court, as saying that they were "very disappointed" to hear of the ruling and noted that their proposed merger had already been approved by the New Jersey Department of Health and the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General (copy enclosed)..(js)
|
|
Filing 7
LETTER addressed to Clerk of the Court from David Basch dated 8/30/2021 re: Rule 201 Judicial Notice. Document filed by David Basch..(rro)
|
|
Mailed a copy of #6 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment to Richard Arjun Kaul at 440 c Somerset Drive, Pearl River, NJ 10965; and to David Basch at 90 S Sparta Ave., Sparta, NJ 07871. (kh)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying without prejudice #3 Motion for Summary Judgment. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice to renewal at a later stage of the litigation. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se plaintiffs in this matter. So Ordered.. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/2/2021) (js) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, re: #3 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul. (sc)
|
|
Filing 4
DECLARATION OF RICHARD ARJUN KAUL, MD IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION TO ENTER SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, re: #3 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul. (sc)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Document filed by Richard Arjun Kaul.(sc)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Allstate Insurance Company, Atlantic Health System, Christopher J. Cristie, Federation State Medical Boards, GEICO, Max Gersenoff, Gurbir Grewal, Robert Heary, Arthur Henrerer, Intercontinental Exchange, Jane Doe, John Doe, Philip Murphy, Rivkin Radler Law Firm, Daniel Stolz, TD Bank. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number 465401284753)Document filed by David Basch, Richard Arjun Kaul, Jane Doe, John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Receipt).(rdz)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (rdz)
|
|
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Allstate Insurance Company, Atlantic Health System, Christopher J. Cristie, Federation State Medical Boards, GEICO, Max Gersenoff, Gurbir Grewal, Robert Heary, Arthur Henrerer, Intercontinental Exchange, Jane Doe, John Doe, Philip Murphy, Rivkin Radler Law Firm, Daniel Stolz. (rdz)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (rdz)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
