Caldwell v. Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. et al
| Craig Caldwell |
| Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc., Mahesh Aditya, Homaira Akbari, Leonard Coleman, Jr., Stephen A. Ferriss, Victor Hill, Edith E. Holiday, Javier Maldonado, Robert McCarthy, William Muir and William Rainer |
| Juan Carlos Alvarez de Soto |
| 1:2021cv07842 |
| September 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) Mahesh Aditya, Homaira Akbari, Juan Carlos Alvarez de Soto, Leonard Coleman, Jr., Stephen A. Ferriss, Victor Hill, Edith E. Holiday, Javier Maldonado, Robert McCarthy, William Muir, William Rainer, Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc.. Document filed by Craig Caldwell. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Lifshitz, Joshua) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Application GRANTED. The initial pretrial conference in this matter is hereby ADJOURNED to March 17, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket entry 6. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/11/2022)
|
| Filing 6 JOINT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Shahzeb Lari dated February 11, 2022. Document filed by Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc...(Lari, Shahzeb) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. answer due 3/1/2022., Set/Reset Hearings:( Initial Conference set for 3/17/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Katherine Polk Failla.) (rro) Modified on 2/22/2022 (rro). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application GRANTED. Defendant shall file a response to the Complaint on or before February 15, 2022. The initial pretrial conference is ADJOURNED to February 16, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket entry 4. Initial Conference set for 2/16/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Katherine Polk Failla.. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 12/16/2021) (rro)
|
| Filing 4 LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Joshua M. Lifshitz dated December 16, 2021. Document filed by Craig Caldwell..(Lifshitz, Joshua) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Mahesh Aditya answer due 2/15/2022; Homaira Akbari answer due 2/15/2022; Juan Carlos Alvarez de Soto answer due 2/15/2022; Leonard Coleman, Jr. answer due 2/15/2022; Stephen A. Ferriss answer due 2/15/2022; Victor Hill answer due 2/15/2022; Edith E. Holiday answer due 2/15/2022; Javier Maldonado answer due 2/15/2022; Robert McCarthy answer due 2/15/2022; William Muir answer due 2/15/2022; William Rainer answer due 2/15/2022; Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. answer due 2/15/2022. (rro) |
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on December 22, 2021, at 11:30 a.m. The conference will be held telephonically. At the scheduled date and time, the parties are to call (888) 363-4749 and enter access code 5123533. Initial Conference set for 12/22/2021 at 11:30 AM before Judge Katherine Polk Failla. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 9/28/2021) (rro)
|
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Joshua M. Lifshitz. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Juan Carlos Alvarez de Soto. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly;. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Lifshitz, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mahesh Aditya, Homaira Akbari, Juan Carlos Alvarez de Soto, Leonard Coleman, Jr., Stephen A. Ferriss, Victor Hill, Edith E. Holiday, Javier Maldonado, Robert McCarthy, William Muir, William Rainer, Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25085140)Document filed by Craig Caldwell..(Lifshitz, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
