Powell v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. et al
| Sumaiyah Powell |
| Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., Burgerlicious III, Inc., Fordham Foods (USA), Inc., Rhomino Rose, Vijay Ghei, Kapil Satija and Fordham Foods (USA), Inc. doing business as Checkers |
| 1:2021cv07844 |
| September 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Vernon S Broderick |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint, . Document filed by Burgerlicious III, Inc., Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., Fordham Foods (USA), Inc., Vijay Ghei, Rhomino Rose, Kapil Satija..(Rowe, Douglas) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Douglas Evan Rowe on behalf of Burgerlicious III, Inc., Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., Fordham Foods (USA), Inc., Vijay Ghei, Rhomino Rose, Kapil Satija..(Rowe, Douglas) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc. waiver sent on 9/20/2021, answer due 11/19/2021; Rhomino Rose waiver sent on 9/20/2021, answer due 11/19/2021; Kapil Satija waiver sent on 9/20/2021, answer due 11/19/2021. Document filed by Sumaiyah Powell..(Altaras, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Burgerlicious III, Inc. waiver sent on 9/20/2021, answer due 11/19/2021; Fordham Foods (USA), Inc. waiver sent on 9/20/2021, answer due 11/19/2021; Vijay Ghei waiver sent on 9/20/2021, answer due 11/19/2021. Document filed by Sumaiyah Powell..(Altaras, Daniel) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Daniel Judah Altaras. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Bronx;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to New York;. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Daniel Judah Altaras. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Fordham Foods (USA), Inc.. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: alias party name was omitted;. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Altaras, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Burgerlicious III, Inc., Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., Fordham Foods (USA), Inc., Vijay Ghei, Rhomino Rose, Kapil Satija. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number BNYSDC-25086039)Document filed by Sumaiyah Powell..(Altaras, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
